The Impact of Family Status on the Enforcement of Gratification Laws in Indonesia

Authors

  • Sariat Arifia Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Bambang Aref Wibowo Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Caskiman Universitas Al-Azhar Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/hsc.v2i2.3174

Keywords:

family status; gratification; anti-corruption law; social media; legal loopholes; Indonesia; law enforcement

Abstract

This research examined the influence of family status on enforcing anti-gratification laws in Indonesia. This study aimed to identify how familial relationships affect legal processes, identify legal loopholes, and offer recommendations to enhance anti-gratification enforcement. The research analyzed recent cases involving high-ranking officials using a normative and descriptive-analytical approach. This study focused on the legal significance of family information recorded on the official Family Card (Kartu Keluarga) and its impact on case identification and prosecution. Findings revealed that family status played a significant role in tracking asset flows and establishing links between public officials and gratification sources. However, ambiguities in the legal definition of "family" often created loopholes that obstructed consistent legal action. The study also found that social media had become an unintentional yet powerful channel for exposing gratification cases, particularly through content shared by family members. While such public disclosures prompted official investigations, they also raised concerns about objectivity and legal consistency. The research concluded that comprehensive legal reform is essential to clarify familial definitions, close enforcement gaps, and ensure that digital disclosures are handled fairly. These findings strengthen Indonesia's legal framework for combating corruption-related gratification practices.

References

Aidy, W. R., Kardinah Indrianna Meutia, Mic Finanto Ario Bangun, & Syauket, A. (2023). Flexing Harta di Media Sosial: Anak Kunci Pembuka Kotak Pandora. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v17i3.2426

Arfiani, A., Syofyan, S., & Delyarahmi, S. (2023). PROBLEMATIKA PENEGAKAN HUKUM DELIK OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.294

Gde, A. A., & Semadi, P. (2024). Peran Media Sosial Dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law Research, 2(1). https://journal.tirtapustaka.com/index.php/ijolares

Irawan, T., Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya Palangka Raya, S., Tengah, K., & Tambun Bungai Palanka Palangka Raya Palangka Raya, S. (2024). ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT AND DYNAMICS OF GRATIFICATION IN THE PRACTICE OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai, 9(1), 440–449.

Rassat, F. S. (2023, December 12). KPK sebut fenomena flexing berujung pengungkapan korupsi pada 2023. Antaranews.Com. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3867162/kpk-sebut-fenomena-flexing-berujung-pengungkapan-korupsi-pada-2023#google_vignette

Reksa, A. L. P. (2024). PERAN MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM MEMBENTUK OPINI PUBLIK TERHADAP PROSES PERADILAN. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461

Rifai, E. (2021). Law Enforcement and Justice Issues in Gratification Criminal Cases. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 16(2).

Rompegading, A. M. (2022). Deterrence and Eradication of Gratification Crime. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v3i2.161

Huda, S., Sugiri, B., Aprilianda, N., & Hadi, H. R. (2022). Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 2(12), 4216–4228. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v2i12.2052

Sitompul, A., Sitompul, R. M., & Sitompul, Mhd. N. (2024). Gratification development in corruption in Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 3(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77

Suryanto, A. F. B. (2021). Penegakan Hukum dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Suap Menyuap Dan Gratifikasi Di Indonesia. Dharmasisya, 1(2).

Susanti, E., Raisa Monica, D., & Afkary, R. (2024). OPTIMIZING THE ROLE OF THE COMMUNITY THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF OVERCOMING CORRUPTION CRIMES TO ENSURE COMMUNITY WELFARE. International Journal of Advanced Research, 12(04), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/18554

Tallaut, L. J., & Adhari, A. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Kriteria Kewenangan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3426

UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tipikor. (n.d.).

voi.id. (2023, December 12). Nawawi Reveals New Phenomenon Of Officials In Front Of Jokowi: Flexing Assets Turns Out To Be The Result Of Corruption. Https://Voi.Id/Berita/338294/Nawawi-Ungkap-Fenomena-Baru-Pejabat-Di-Hadapan-Jokowi-Flexing-Harta-Ternyata-Hasil-Korupsi.

Windiarti, L. (2024). Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi yang Sudah Menjadi Normalisasi Masyarakat Indonesia Ditinjau dari Aspek Budaya Hukum. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 17, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v17i.1117

Wulandari, & Ramadi, B. (2023). Peran Media Sosial Dalam Mengungkapkan Kasus Korupsi dan Dampak Terhadap Opini Publik. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v1i1.571

Downloads

Published

May 31, 2025

Citation Check

Article Index