An Explanatory Sequential Study on Adverse Childhood Experiences and Parental Readiness of Fur Parents
English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/hsc.v3i1.3299Keywords:
Explanatory Sequential Study, Fur Parents, Fur Baby, Adverse, Childhood Experiences, Parental ReadinessAbstract
This study investigated the relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and parental readiness among fur parents—individuals who consider their pets as children, forming deep emotional bonds and assuming caregiving roles akin to traditional parenting. An explanatory sequential design was employed, combining quantitative data with qualitative insights. Participants were adults aged 18 or older who identified as fur parents and had chosen not to have biological children. The ACE-Q and READI-SF instruments were utilized to assess ACE exposure and parental readiness. The READI-SF is a 17-item measure assessing readiness to engage in parenting roles, with higher scores indicating greater readiness. An a priori power analysis suggested a sample size of 115 participants; however, due to the niche nature of the group, 81 participants were recruited. Quantitative analysis revealed a weak positive correlation between ACE scores and parental readiness (r = 0.17), which was not statistically significant (p = 0.14). The average ACE score was 0.36 (SD = 0.34), indicating low exposure to adverse experiences, while the average READI-SF score was 3.87 (SD = 0.42), reflecting a moderate level of parental readiness. These findings suggest that, within this sample, a history of adverse childhood experiences does not significantly impact an individual's readiness to assume parenting roles. This may be attributed to the limited sample size or conceptual differences between ACEs and readiness for parental involvement. In the qualitative phase, four key themes emerged: (1) Parental Priorities, revealing factors influencing the choice of fur parenting over biological children; (2) Parental Perspectives, reflecting how past experiences shaped views on parenting; (3) Parental Alternatives, examining outcomes and experiences associated with fur parenting as an alternative to traditional parenting; and (4) Fur Parenting Attachment, illustrating how childhood experiences motivated participants to become better caregivers, not only to their pets but also, potentially, to children in the future. These themes provide context for understanding how fur parents perceive their roles and readiness. Overall, the study underscores the need for further research to identify other potential influences on parental readiness.
References
Andrade, G., Ahmed, U. A., Al-Nuaimy, Y. A. M. Z., Zyara, Z. H. A., Hameed, H. S., & Bedewy, D. (2024). Cat ownership, psychotic experiences and moral decision-making in sacrificial dilemmas: A study in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2024.2313571
Aruah, D. E., Ezeh, V. O., & Tom, C. I. (2019). Relationship between pet ownership, pet attachment and decision to have children among single people in the United States: A need for flexible childcare facilities in the United States. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(9), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.79002
Coker, D. (2021). Re: How many participants are usually interviewed in qualitative phenomenological research? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_many_participants_are_usually_interviewed_in_a_qualitative_phenomenological_research/600091f065056f097e1fdfc7/citation/download
Corrigan, P. W., Rafacz, J., & Rüsch, N. (2011). Examining a progressive model of self-stigma and its impact on people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Research, 189(3), 339–343.
Daines, C. L., Hansen, D., Novilla, M. L. B., & Crandall, A. (2021). Effects of positive and negative childhood experiences on adult family health. BMC Public Health, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10732-w
Doyle, M. (2017, August 10). Mediation at its core: Insight into a qualitative research study on the lived experiences of parties to mediation. Essex CAJI. https://essexcaji.org/2017/07/27/mediation-at-its-core-insight-into-a-qualitative-research-study-on-the-lived-experiences-of-parties-to-mediation/
Guo, Z., Ren, X., Zhao, J., Jiao, L., & Xu, Y. (2021). Can pets replace children? The interaction effect of pet attachment and subjective socioeconomic status on fertility intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168610
Hatley-Cotter, A., Saad, G., & Brestan-Knight, E. (2022). Treatment readiness among primarily Latine families seeking parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) in an urban setting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084784
Hansen-Oja, M., Dluzniewski, A., Baker, R., & Casanova, M. (2025). Positive mental health: Psychometric evaluation of the PMHI-19 in a sample of university student-athletes and dancers. Psychology International, 7, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7010015
Hawkins, R. D., Ellis, A., & Robinson, C. (2024, January 1). Exploring the connection between pet attachment and owner mental health: The roles of owner-pet compatibility, perceived pet welfare, and behavioral issues. medRxiv. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.11.20.24317636v1.article-info
Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., & Hardcastle, K. A. (2025). The relationship between parental adverse childhood experiences and offspring preschool readiness: The mediating role of psychological resilience. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40359-025-02408-6
Inspire Veterinary Partners, Inc. (2024, February 28). More millennials are opting for pets over children as pet industry continues to grow. Yahoo Finance. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/more-millennials-opting-pets-over-133000964.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEmvcxyXJuyscRdIGtqGhzTQmrg6nzJmtsUQG5V7G3MYbNBzvyuodDI2ZJdigzH8Io-ZM3JxGEhPda2ohxEj09JoCAr4l276CDRUHJC01ZP0vv9Adfki-GJf64_1xoVrFoYy7zHy8jDDig5w8Z7o0jZ4CG3ox-Sw4yTNSQrfXogG
Klugman, N. (2024, November 5). Dog, cat or fur baby? Why we are in love with our pets. BWM. https://bowwowinsurance.com.au/pet-community/pet-talk/dog-cat-or-fur-baby/#:~:text=Fur%20baby%20(also%20fur%20child,baby%E2%80%9D%20to%20its%20official%20lexicon
Lance, C., Butts, M., & Michels, L. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
Lanius, R. A., Vermetten, E., & Pain, C. A. (2024). Transition to motherhood: Adverse childhood experiences, and support from partner, family, and friends. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-024-03922-6
Lass-Hennemann, J., Schäfer, S. K., Sopp, M. R., & Michael, T. (2022). The relationship between attachment to pets and mental health: The shared link via attachment to humans. BMC Psychiatry, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04199-1
Martin, F., Bachert, K. E., Snow, L., Tu, H. W., Belahbib, J., & Lyn, S. A. (2021). Depression, anxiety, and happiness in dog owners and potential dog owners during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0260676.
McLeod, S., PhD. (2023). Social roles and social norms in psychology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-roles.html
O’Donnell, A. T., & Foran, A.-M. (2024). The link between anticipated and internalized stigma and depression: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 349, 116869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.116869
Olsson, M. B., & Westman, J. (2019). Charting a course towards resilience following adverse childhood experiences: Addressing intergenerational trauma via strengths-based intervention. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/8/10/844
Pearcy, A. (2024, November 7). Millennials are raising pets instead of kids. It’s not going well for the pets. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/millennials-raising-pets-instead-kids-spoiled-dogs-cats-anxiety-health-2024-11
PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). (2023, December 5). OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
Podberscek, A. L., Paul, E. S., & Serpell, J. A. (Eds.). (2000). Companion animals and us: Exploring the relationships between people and pets. Cambridge University Press.
Proctor, K., Brestan-Knight, E., Fan, J., & Zlomke, K. (2018). Assessing parental readiness to change: A psychometric evaluation of the READI-SF in a community sample. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0952-9
Spinazzola, J., Van Der Kolk, B., & Ford, J. D. (2021). Developmental trauma disorder: A legacy of attachment trauma in victimized children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(4), 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22697
Wattanatchariya, K., Narkpongphun, A., & Kawilapat, S. (2024). The relationship between parental adverse childhood experiences and parenting behaviors. Acta psychologica, 243, 104166.
Ye, Z., Wei, X., Zhang, J., Li, H., & Cao, J. (2023). The impact of adverse childhood experiences on depression: The role of insecure attachment styles and emotion dysregulation strategies. Current Psychology, 43(5), 4016–4026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04613-1
Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2025). The relationship between parental adverse childhood experiences and offspring preschool readiness: The mediating role of psychological resilience. BMC Psychology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02408-6
Published
Citation Check
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Humanities, Society, and Community
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) has CC-BY NC as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights. The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Humanities, Society, and Community).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) or its sublicense.
8. Miscellaneous
Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Humanities, Society, and Community (HSC) may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
