International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities

Building Readiness to Change in Organization through the Role of Affective Commitment and Personal Characteristics

2024-09-20T10:10:47+07:00

Human Capital as an intangible asset is the key to building Readiness for Change (RTC), which is rooted in Self-Efficacy (SE) and Job Satisfaction (JS), which in several previous studies were not significant. Human capital refers to the role of Individuals as important agents in organizations based on the existence of Personal Characteristics (PC) that facilitate the achievement of SE and JS to improve RTC. The purpose of the study is to offer Affective Commitment (AC) as mediating variable in the nexus between SE and JS. This study uses a quantitative approach with 124 school principals in Indonesia, employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine Affective Commitment (AC) in bridging the gap between SE and JS on RTC. The results of empirical testing using SEM instruments processed with AMOS software show that AC can fully mediate JS (B= 0.614) on the RTC. However, AC utilizes only part of SE (B= 0.390) in the RTC. This finding confirms that the best path to building an RTC through PC strengthening is through JS and AC. The principal, in their capacity as an organizational leader, holds a pivotal role in cultivating an environment conducive to fostering self-efficacy (SE) and establishing a cohesive, innovative atmosphere that emphasizes the influence of personal character on job satisfaction. Moreover, it is imperative for the principal to advocate for continuous enhancement of knowledge and expertise through structured training, autonomous learning, and collaborative knowledge-sharing practices. This finding contributes to the body of knowledge in the perspective of commitment from Human Capital.

Assessment of Indonesia’s Mineral Value-Added Policy: A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

2024-06-15T10:55:48+07:00

This study addresses a gap in Indonesia’s mineral-downstream policy research by identifying the optimal policy scenario for enhancing the added value of primary metal mineral commodities. This research examines competitive and comparative advantages and economic impacts using system dynamics modeling. Initially, qualitative interviews are conducted to identify elements affecting domestic refining facilities’ growth, followed by quantitative surveys and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize factors fostering these advantages. Findings suggest that developing existing theories to fit Indonesia’s specific context is crucial, and focus group discussions with key mining company decision makers are recommended to develop relevant indices. This method evaluates policy options to determine those offering the most significant economic advantage for each mineral type by analyzing unique characteristics and mapping them to suitable policies. Integrating competitive and comparative advantages into the mineral-added value policy context maximizes economic returns and provides practical recommendations for policymakers, addressing a critical gap in the literature.

Developing a Sustainable Integration Model for Sectoral State-Owned Holdings: A Conceptual Framework

2024-09-01T12:40:40+07:00

This paper develops a comprehensive conceptual framework aimed at integrating and synergizing Sectoral State-Owned Holdings (SOHs) to significantly enhance their competitiveness and sustainability. The framework is designed to fill critical gaps in the existing literature by addressing key areas, such as value creation, innovation, and strategic alignment, which are essential for the long-term success of SOHs. One of the primary contributions of this framework is its emphasis on the incorporation of non-economic factors, such as customer satisfaction, community engagement, and environmental stewardship, which are increasingly recognized as vital components of sustainable business practices. The framework also delves into the nuanced impact of government intervention on the performance and strategic orientation of SOHs, exploring how state policies and regulations can either enable or hinder their growth and competitive positioning. By providing a structured approach, this framework enables SOHs to leverage their unique resources and capabilities more effectively, ensuring that they achieve sustainable competitive advantages. Furthermore, the framework underscores the importance of aligning SOH strategies with national economic and social objectives, thereby positioning these entities not only as key drivers of economic growth but also as contributors to broader societal well-being. Ultimately, this paper offers a valuable tool for policymakers, managers, and researchers interested in optimizing the performance and strategic impact of SOHs in a dynamic global economy.