Pedagogical Innovative Methods and Classroom Management in Nigeria


  • Nimota jibola Kadir Abdullahi University of ilorin, Nigeria



Computational Thinking, Embodied Learning, Context-Based Learning, Innovative Methods


The primary goal of this research was to determine the relationship between innovative pedagogical methods and classroom management. Traditional pedagogy has been found to be out of date in recent years, especially in terms of how teachers deliver their teaching and management of the classroom. The time is right to recognize cutting-edge educational pedagogical innovative methods that are currently being implemented on a world wild scale or locally, depending on the needs of the region. A quantitative research design was adopted for the study. A sample of 761 participants was selected randomly selected from the sample public primary schools in the North-west zone, Nigeria. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis were used to test the hypotheses. The findings revealed that computational thinking-embodied learning and context-based learning positively and significantly correlated with classroom management. Therefore, it was recommended that School managers should continue to encourage learners' computational thinking so as to help learner experience a deeper level of involvement and understanding. Also, school managers should continue to improve embodied learning in order to help teachers reach out to the mind of learners and make lessons more interesting. Furthermore, school managers should encourage context-based learning by giving learners a perfect degree of autonomy over learning activities, helping learner activate their thinking and meta-cognitive skills toward achieving effective classroom management.


Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2020). educational leadership behaviour and community engagement in Kwara State, Nigeria. Educational Leader (Peminnpin Pendidikan), 8(1), 45-62.

Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2019). Education quality management ad teacher effectiveness in Nigeria. Attarbawiy: Malaysia Online Journal of Business Studies, 3(1), 59-68

Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2018). Teacher training and classroom management in Nigeria. Journal of Education in Developing Area, 26(1), 32-41.

Anderson, R. T., Neri, L. (2017). reliability-centered maintenance: Management and engineering methods. Springer Science and Business Media.

Adzongo, P. T., Shir, J. N., & Hemba, D. B. (2016). A pedagogical approach to basic issues in pre-primary and primary education in Nigeria. Makurdi: Power Computer and Communication.

Agu, J. C. (2021). Influence of teachers’ classroom management technique on students academic performance in Njikoka, L. G. A. International Journal of Innovative Education Research, 9(1) 33-44.

Akpakwu, S. O. (2012). Educational management theory and practice. Makurdi: Destiny Ventures.

Asiyai, R. L. (2011). Classroom management techniques and secondary school effectiveness. An International Multi-disciplinary Journal, 5(1), 282-291.

Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2007). Business research methods (5th ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.

Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M, (2015). Applying the Research Model Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd Ed.). New York & London: Routledge.

Borghi, A. M., & Zarcone, E. (2016). Grounding abstractness: Abstract concepts and the activation of the mouth. Frontial Psychology. 7:1498. DOI/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01498.

Brophy, R. N. (2016). Classroom management techniques. Education and Urban Education, 5(4), 21-32.

Buccino, G., Golage, I., Gobbi, N. Bonaccorso, G. (2016). Grounding meaning in experience: A broad perspective on embodied language. Neuro Science Bio-Behavioural Review, 69. 69-78. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev-2016.07.033.

Chandler, P., & Tricot, A. (2015). Mind your body. The essential role of the body movements in children’s learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3). 365-370.

Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19(4), 99-104

Cohen, L., Mainion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed,). London: Routledge Falmer.

Chikere, C. C., & Nwoka, J. (2015). The system theory of management in modern day organisations: A study of Aldasate congress resort Limited Port Harcourt. International Journal of Scientific and research Publication, 5(9), 1-7.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach, USA: Sage Publication

Diamantopoulos, A., Marko. S., Chrisoph, F., Petra, W. & Sebastian, K. (2012). Guideline for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434-449.

Dillman, D. A., Jolene, D., & Leah, M. C. (2014). Internet, phone, mail and mixed mode surveys: The Tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Ekoh, A. C. (2016). Traditional pedagogy to innovative pedagogy in business education: A challenge to business educators. Nigeria Journal of Business Education, 3(2), 133-144.

Efendi, M. Y., latief, S., & Lien, H. N. (2020). The educational innovation, comparison of a techno teaching analysis in primary school between Indonesia and Taiwan. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 27-40.

Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., & Mendes, A. J. (2018). Exploring the computational thinking effect in pre-university education. Computer in Human Behaviour, 80, 407-411. 1016/j.chb.2017.12:005

Gargay, & Latchanna (2015). Innovative pedagogical. Retrieved July 18th, 2022 from

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis

Gunbater, M. S. (2019). computational thinking within the context of professional life: Change in computational thinking skill from the view point of teachers. Education and Information Technologies. 24(5), 2629-2652.

Hesse-Biber, S. & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oak, CA: Holbrook, J. (2014). context-based approach to science technology. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(2), 1648-3898.

Igbacha, S. T. (2014). A guide to quality classroom teaching. Makurdi: Kingdom Press

Kukliansky, I., & Eshach, H. (2014). Evaluating a context-based curse on data analysis for physics laboratory. Journal of Science Education Technology, 23(1), 108-115.

Leady, P. D. & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical Research: Planing and design. New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prenctice Hall.

Lehto, A., Kairisto, M., & Liisa, P. T. (2011). Towards innovation pedagogy: A new learning for university of applied science. Report from Turku University of Applied Science.

Liisa, I., & Minna, L. (2018). digital technology and practices for school improvement: Innovative digital school model. Research and Practice in Technology Enhance Learning, 13(25), 22-38.

Mandula, K., Meda, S. R., Jain, D. K. (2012). Research and Implementation of a mobile video streaming application for ubiquitous learning. International Conference on Technology Enhanced Education (ICTEE), 1-6.

Mavilidi, M. F., kely, A., Chandler, P., Domazet, S. L., & Pass, F. (2018). Immediate and delayed effects of interacting physical activity into preschool children’s learning of numeracy skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 502-519.

Mayer, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology (1st ed.) England: Pearson Education Limited.

Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. (2011). Innovative work behaviour in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4, 63-84.

Michael-Allan, A. B. (2015). Improving transfer of learning through designed context-based instructional materials. European Journal of science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 265-274.

Miller, V. D., Poole, M. S, Seibold, D. R., Myers, K. K., Hee Sun, P., & Monge, P. (2013). Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 4-58.

Mirko, S., Valentin, B., Amie, W., Mysto-foteini, M,. David, R. L., & Fred, P. (2019). Embodied learning in the classroom: Effects on primary school children’s attention and foreign language vocabulary learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 43, 45-54.

Mischelle, M. B., & Algeline, S. H. (2020). context-based learning in teaching senior high school: Basis for science instructional material development. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 7(1), 73-81.

Mugenda, A., & Mugenda, O. (2013). Research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Nairobi: ACTS Press.

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. USA: Pearson Education.

Ngerem, E. T. & Okpe, P. U. (2020). Effective classroom management: A panacea for enhancing students learning experience and satisfaction in higher education. Britun Journal of Education, 8(1), 10-19.

Nicolaides, A. (2012). Innovative teaching and learning methodologies for higher education institutions. International Research Journals, 3(8), 620-626.

Nwankwo, A. (2014). Management in education. Ibadan: Giraffe Books

Ong, I. L., Dino, M. J. S., Calimag, M. M. P., & Hidalgo, F. A. (2019). development and validation of interpersonal learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development. PLOS ONE, 14(1). 1-16.

Onyali, L. C., Ezeugbor, C. Okoye, F. (2016). Introducing creativity and innovation int classroom management skill: A panacea for student high performance in secondary schools in Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal for Research in Business, Management and Accounting, 2(8), 22-32.

Otta, F. E. (2010). Classroom management and effective administration of guidance services in schools. In I.L. anukam, P.O.O. Okunamiri & R.N.O. Ogbonna. (Eds.) Basic text on educational management. Imo State, EeHech Versatile Publishers.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

Philomena, I. A., & Temitayo, O. O. (2019). effective teaching and classroom management: A tool for quality education in Nigeria. BSUJEM, 1(2), 1-12.

Research Advisor (2006). Sample size table.

Riley, N., Lubans, D. R., Holmes, K., & Morgan, P. J. (2016). Findings from the easy mind cluster randomized controlled trial: Evaluation of a Pysical activities integration program for mathematics in primary schools. Journal of Physical Activities and health, 13(2), 198-206.

Sawitree, P., Paitoon, P., Somkiat, T., & Akan, N. (2021). Enhancing student computational thinking skills by using a flipped-classroom learning model and critical thinking problem-solving activities: A conceptual framework. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 1352-1363.

Shmidt, M., Benzing, V., Kamer, M. (2016). Classroom-based physical activity breaks and children’s attention: Cognitive engagement works. Frontier in Psychology, 7, 1474,

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory. 30 (3), 167-186.

Tondeur, J., Van-Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical belief and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.

Wing, J. (2014), Computational thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.

Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-325.


Article Metrics


October 31, 2022

Citation Check

How to Cite

Kadir Abdullahi, N. jibola. (2022). Pedagogical Innovative Methods and Classroom Management in Nigeria. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 4(2), 51–68.




Article Index