The Commissioner for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration Office in South Africa: Serving the Interest of the Powerful or the Powerless?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v3i2.1877Keywords:
Democracy, Legislation, CCMA, Labour, Labour Force, Proxy EmployerAbstract
Legislatively, the Office of the Commissioner for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) in the South was created to ensure a fast, convenient, and fair labour dispute mechanism within the labour force environment. While some believe that the Office is fair in the adjudication of cases brought to them, this article argues differently from such held viewpoint. This article argues that the Office of the CCMA largely serves the interest of the Powerful (Employers) and largely ignores the Powerless (Employees). There are few if any, scholarly articles which addressed this crucial element of injustice against the working class in South Africa, which emanates from the ineffective operation of this institution. This article is conceptual in approach, and it uses literature to argue that the current ineffective systems used in the CCMA office ensure little security and protection of employees' rights against well-resourced and labour-abusive employers. The article concludes that the unfair balance of consideration of the interests of the employers and employees at the CCMA renders the purpose of the office ineffective, with no valid moral reason to exist in South Africa.
Downloads
References
Bernikow, R. 2007. Ten years of the CCMA-An Assessment for Labour. Law, Democracy, Development, (2014):13-24.
Ferreira, G. 2004. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration: Its Effectiveness in Dispute Resolution in Labour Relations. Politeia, 23(2):73-85.
Frederick, D.A. 2014. Conflict Theory .Available on https://www.researchgate.net/publications/304223229
Guglu. I. 2014. Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf: A Comparative perspective on class formation and conflict. iiBF Dergisi, 9(2):151-167
Jordaan, B. 2019. Mediation and Conciliation in Collective Labor Conflicts in South Africa. Political Science.DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92531-8-8-19
Li, N. 2018. Theories of Conflict and Conflict Resolution. American International Journal of Social Science,7(4):29-33.
Ndaba, N. 2023. A Commissioner’s Guide to Improve your Chances of Winning CCMA Cases. Labour Research Service: Johannesburg
Okulu, E.P.M.Y. 2014. Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf: A Comparative Perspective on Class Formation and Conflict. Agustos, 9(2):151-167.
Olabiyi, O.J. 2022. A Study of Conflict Resolution Mechanism and Employment Relations in Multinational Corporations in Africa: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria and South Africa. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(0)a1900.
Patel, A and Mhlongo, T. 2021. South Africa: CCMA Process. Johannesburg: Adams & Adams
Policy Brief Series. 2010. Understanding the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Dispute Resolution System in South Africa. An Analysis of the CCMA Data. Development Policy Research Unit. University of Cape Town: Cape Town
Rapatsa, M. 2018. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)in Labour Relations in South Africa: An Appraisal of Efficacy and Challenges. Juridical Tribune, 8(2018): 202-211.
Saroj, P., & Dhanju, S.S. 2019. Conflict Society and Marxism: A critical Analysis. Research Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(4): 315-319.
Smit, N. 2011. How do you Determine a Fair Sanction? Dismissal as Appropriate Sanction in Cases of Dismissal for (mis)conduct. De Jure, 2011:49-73.
Szczecinska-Musielak, E. 2014. Social Conflict Theory in Studying the Conflict in Northen Ireland. Polish Sociological Review, 2014: 120-136.
Tuner, P.2023. Can CCMA awards be reviewed and if so, how? DML Law: Cape Town
Van der Bank, C.M. 2010. A Case Study in Determining Fairness of Dismissal as a Sanction for Misconduct in South Africa. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 4(8):284-289.
Van Eck, S, & Kuhn, R. 2020. Amendments to the CCMA Rules: Thoughts on the Good Bad and the Curious. Industrial Law Journal, (2020): 711-731.
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 0 times
- 0 times
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mokoko Sebola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
