The Role of Traditional Leadership in Rural Development in South Africa: An Analysis of the Dualistic Government System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v4i2.1943Keywords:
Collaborative Learning Theory; Dualistic Governance System; Rural Development; Service Delivery; Spatial Development; Traditional LeadershipAbstract
Rural areas in many developing countries face distinct development challenges that often require a nuanced understanding of local governance structures. In many rural areas, traditional leadership coexists with local government structures as custodians of governance, resulting in what can be termed a dualistic government system. The dualistic government system is evident where traditional leadership operates alongside the modern democratic government structures, which were established in the post-apartheid era to provide effective service delivery. However, in some cases, there have been clashes between local governments and traditional leadership in attempting to provide service delivery in the land still under the custodianship of chieftains, which hindered the effective provision of service in most rural areas. This paper examines the role of traditional leadership in rural development by focusing on the dualistic government system prevalent in chieftain-controlled areas, using the case of Motantanyane Village in Limpopo Province, South Africa. The paper was based on a mixed-methods (qualitative and quantitative) research approach, with a sample of 86 participants who were sampled on the basis of purposive sampling and systematic sampling designs. Semi-structured questionnaires and unstructured interviews were used to collect qualitative and quantitative data. The findings showed that traditional leadership is a cornerstone of rural development and that their leadership is essential for bringing about constructive change and promoting development within their communities. The paper concluded that despite its flaws, traditional leadership continues to be important and relevant in rural communities today, especially regarding protecting social traditions, customs, and cultural values. The paper recommended that the role of traditional leadership be redefined in legislative frameworks and that it be involved in all facets of rural development decision-making to create more effective and inclusive development that addresses the issues of chieftain-controlled communities.
Downloads
References
Bakamana, D. B. (2021). Extracting Best Practices from Luba Traditional Leadership Structures and integrating them into Contemporary Political and Social Transformation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(1), 78-96. http://cedred.org/jais/index.php/issues
Baloyi, T. B. (2016). The role of traditional leadership in local government (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Wits School of Governance). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188774625.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
De Kadt, D., & Larreguy, H. A. (2018). Agents of the regime? Traditional leaders and electoral politics in South Africa. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 382-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/694540
Drummond, J., & Nel, V. (2021). Mahikeng: Where traditional leadership and development frameworks collide. In South African Urban Change Three Decades After Apartheid: Homes Still Apart? (pp. 197-214). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73073-4_12
Dubazane, M. & Nel, V. (2016). The relationship of traditional leaders and the municipal council concerning land use management in Nkandla Local Municipality. Indilinga African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 15(3), 222-238. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-533a3bd50
Huang, Y. & Ning, C. (2021). Enhancing critical thinking in Chinese students in physical education through collaborative learning and visualization. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100958
Koenane, M. L. J. (2018). The role and significance of traditional leadership in the governance of modern democratic South Africa. Africa Review, 10(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2017.1399563
Lukat, E., Pahl-Wostl, C. & Lenschow, A. (2022). Deficits in implementing integrated water resources management in South Africa: The role of institutional interplay. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 304-313.
Makhoba, N. T. (2020). Assessing the roles of traditional leadership in land-use planning and municipal governance in Nquthu Local Municipality (Doctoral dissertation). https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/20220
Maleham, N. (2018). Almost three years after commencement of the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act 16 of 2013: An analysis of challenges to its implementation with relation to planning applications and appeals (Doctoral dissertation).
Maleka, K., & Rapatsa, M. (2021). South Africa's Legal Framework on Spatial Planning and Development: A Historical and Constitutional Context of Local Government. Persp. L. Pub. Admin., 10, 85.
Maluleke, G. (2017). The Determinants of Government Expenditure: Analysis of the Empirical Literature from 1995 To 20161. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Œconomica, 13(2), 212-219. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=547193
Mamokhere, J. (2020). An assessment of reasons behind service delivery protests: A case of Greater Tzaneen Municipality. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), 2049.
Maseko, M. M. (2016). Gender Responsive Budgeting in a Large Metropolitan Area in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa).
Mashamaite, K. A. (2023). Rural entrepreneurship and its implications on local economic development: a case of Mogalakwena Local Municipality, Waterburg District, Limpopo Province (Doctoral dissertation).
Mathonsi, N. & Sithole, S. (2017). The incompatibility of traditional leadership and democratic experimentation in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(5), 35-46. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-6a0533067
Mawere, J., Matshidze, P. E., Kugara, S. L. & Madzivhandila, T. (2022). The role and significance of traditional leadership in South African local governance. In Handbook of research on protecting and managing global indigenous knowledge systems. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7492-8.ch014
Mokwena, R. J., Motsepe L. L. & Shandu S. N. (2020). A Study of Land Restitution to Rural Communities in South Africa: An Analysis of Traditional Leaders Perceptives. Gender & Behaviour, 18(3) 16132-16144. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/study-land-restitution-rural-communities south/docview/2477274539/se-2
Monama, S. A., Mokoele, N. J. & Mokgotho, K. D. (2022). South African Spatial Planning Fragmentation: Repealing the Apartheid Planning Imprint. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 26, 1-11. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/south-africanspatial-planning-fragmentation/docview/2608165086/se-2
Mubangizi, B. C. (2022). The Interplay between Civil Society and Local Government in South Africa: Conflict and Collaboration in the Delivery of Public Services. African Journal of Development Studies, 2022(si1), 39.
Mudimeli, R. N. (2019). Determining the Functionality of Traditional Leadership Councils as Agents of Rural Development in Vhembe District, South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1296
Mustasilta, K. (2021). The implications of traditional authority contest for local-level stability–Evidence from South Africa. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(4), 457-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894220959655
Nakata, Y., Nitta, R. & Tsuda, A. (2022). Understanding motivation and classroom modes of regulation in collaborative learning: An exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1846040
Nemukula, L. E. (2019). The role of traditional leadership in community development: A case study of Thulamela local municipality in Vhembe District of Limpopo province, South Africa. Doctoral dissertation. University of Venda. http://hdl.handle.net/11602/1469
Nkosi, S.A. (2016). Participation of traditional leadership on spatial planning and land use management matters in the Mpumalanga province Republic of South Africa. Doctoral dissertation. University of the Free State. http://hdl.handle.net/11660/7783
Nxumalo, F. T. (2012). Traditional leadership in local economic development: a case study of the uMgungundlovu District (Doctoral dissertation).
O’Leary, Z. (2014). The essential guide to doing your research project (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Parcells, A. (2022). “The Empire that Shaka Zulu was Unable to Bring About”: Ethnicizing Sovereignty in Apartheid South Africa, 1959–1970. Journal of Social History, 56(1), 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac021
Qumba, M. (2021). The interface between local government and traditional authority: exploring infrastructure development in Mbizana Local Municipality. Doctoral dissertation. University of KwaZulu-Natal. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/handle/10413/20060
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (1996). The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act, 1996. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2003a). Traditional Leadership Governance Framework Act, Act 41 of 2003. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2003b). The White Paper on Traditional Leadership and Governance. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2013). Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, 16 of 2013 (SPLUMA). Pretoria: Government Printers.
Republic of South Africa, (RSA). (2000). Local government: Municipal Systems Act, 32 of 2000. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Rogerson, C. M. (2022). Tourism Evolution in Rural South Africa: From Native Reserve to Apartheid Bantustans c 1920-1994. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 40(1), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.40114-810
Sato, Y., Lundstedt, M., Morrison, K., Boese, V. A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2022). Institutional order in episodes of autocratization. V-Dem Working Paper, 133. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4239798
Saunders, M. (2009). Research methods for business students. Person Education Limited.
Schnaubert, L. & Bodemer, D. (2022). Group awareness and regulation in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 17(1), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09361-1
Skosana, W. (2019). Diversity and Employee Engagement in Professional Service Firms (Master's thesis, University of Pretoria (South Africa)).
Tshitangoni, M., & Francis, J. (2018). Relevance of traditional leadership in rural community development amidst democratic institutions in Southern Africa: A critical review. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 15(2), 70-83.
Wang, Q. J., Feng, G. F., Wang, H. J., & Chang, C. P. (2021). The impacts of democracy on innovation: Revisited evidence. Technovation, 108, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102333
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 0 times
- 0 times
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sakiel Albert Monama, Ngoako Johannes Mokoele
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
