Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in Municipal Planning and Management: A Pathway to Improve South African Service Delivery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v4i1.2015Keywords:
Geographical Information Systems (GIS),, Service Delivery, Municipalities, Planning,, Management.Abstract
In the years after 1994, the democratic government of South Africa worked to transfer and extend basic service provision to practically all sections of the country. The delivery of public services continues to be an embarrassment to humanity and the developmental state. Without proper basic services such as water, sanitation, power, infrastructure, health facilities, and housing, a large section of South Africa’s people would continue to live and die. As a result, society remains disenfranchized and exposed to socioeconomic shocks, contributing to the economy's decline and destruction. To support successful service delivery, the integration of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) as a shift from human-led operations to computerized operations is now recognized and required in municipal planning and management. The central purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of applying GIS as a crucial planning tool infused within integrated development planning in municipal planning and management. The current state of service delivery in existing municipal planning and management procedures, as well as the factors that influence it and the effect it has on society, will be examined. This conceptual study employs secondary data and follows a certain methodology. Using the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodology, secondary data were examined. The results demonstrate that political influence and manipulation, a lack of openness and accountability, insufficient citizen participation, a lack of personnel capability, and poor planning, monitoring, and evaluation contribute to poor public service delivery in South Africa. Furthermore, the findings indicate that GIS functions as a tool for visualization and collation of spatial information, map production, and data capturing and storage in local municipalities with the aim of enhancing public service delivery.
Downloads
References
Ali, E. (2020). Geographic Information System (GIS): Definition, Development, Applications and Components, Department of Geography, 8.
ArcNews Winter. (2013). Improving Service Delivery and Collaboration in South Africa.
Bezegmez, M. (2020). Municipal GIS.
Buckley, D. (1997). The GIS Primer: An Introduction to Geographic Information Systems, 85.
Chelechele, T.I. (2009). Skills Development in the South African Public Service Problems and Solutions. Journal of Public Administration, 44(1), 44 – 57.
Community Development Toolbox. (2021). GIS Applications in Municipal Management: Strategies for Small Towns. GIS Guide.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. (1996). Government Printers, Pretoria.
Crous, M. (2004). Service delivery in the South African public service: Implementation of the Batho Pele principles by Statistics South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 39(1), 574-589
Draai, E. (2010). Collaborative government for improved public service delivery in South Africa. Africa Insight, 40(2), 131-140.
Engelbrecht, J. (2011). Mobile GIS in local government to enhance service delivery.
ESRI. (2019). What is GIS?
Franch-Pardo, I., Napoletano, B.M., Rosete-Verges, F., & Billa, L. (2020). Spatial analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19: A review, Science of The Total Environment, 739. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/science-of-the-total-environment
Gauteng News, (2024). South Africa’s Service Delivery Crisis: Causes and Solutions. Politics Bulletin. Retrieved from https://gauteng.net/news/south-africas-service-delivery-crisis/#google_vignette
Hirschheim, R. (2008). Some guidelines for the critical reviewing of conceptual papers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(8), 432–441.
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1-2), 18–26. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Keeton, R., & Nijhuis, S. (2019). Spatial challenges in contemporary African New Towns and potentials for alternative planning strategies. International Planning Studies, 24(3-4), 218-234.
Keller, M. (2021). Poor Service Delivery Deprives People of Dignity and Their Basic Himan Rights. Op-Ed. Retrieved from https://amnesty.org.za/poor-service-delivery-deprives-people-of-dignity-and-their-basic-human-rights/
Kgobe, F., Bayat, M.S., & Karriem, A. (2023). Evaluating the Implementation of Public Participation in Service Delivery Planning in the Democratic Age: A Case of South African Municipalities. Commonwealth Youth and Development, 20.
Kgobe, F.K.L. & Makalela, K.I. (2018). The unabated power of South African traditional leaders on service delivery enhancement. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA). 04-06 July 2018, Stellenbosch University, Saldanha Bay, South Africa.
Kgobe, F.K.L., (2020_. Africanised public administration sold out public service delivery: a case of South Africa. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternative (IPADA).
Madue S. M. (2015). Local Government Administration in Postapartheid South Africa: Some Critical Perspectives. In Sebola M.P. (ed.). The Role of Local Government in Service Delivery. Batalea Publishers, Polokwane
Mamokhere, J. (2019). An exploration of reasons behind service delivery protests in South Africa: A case of Bolobedu South at the Greater Tzaneen Municipality. International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives (IPADA).
Mamokhere, J. (2022). The Integrated Development Planning Process for improved community participation: the case of the Tzaneen Municipal Area (Masters Dissertation, University of Johannesburg (South Africa). Johannesburg).
Mamokhere, J., & Kgobe, F.K.L. (2023). Service Delivery Protests in South African Municipalities: Trends, Factors, Impact and Recommendations. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 10(2), 49 – 59.
Maserumule, H.M. (2011). Good governance in the new partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD): A Public Administration perspective. Doctor of Literature and Philosophy thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Masuku, M.M. and Jili, N.N. (2019). Public service delivery in South Africa: The political influence at local government level. Journal of Public Affairs, 19(4), 1935.
McGaghie, W. C., Bordage, G., & Shea, J. A. (2001). Problem Statement, Conceptual Framework, and Research Question. Academic Medicine, 76(9), 923–924.
Mullet, D. R. (2018). A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29 (2), 116–142. http://doi.org/10.1177/1932202x18758260
Naidoo, G. (2011). Adopting an appropriate leadership approach to improve public service delivery in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 4(3), 45 – 59.
Naidoo, G.S. (2004). Leadership and governance for a sustainable public service. The case for selected South African public service organizations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
Nambalirwa, S. & Sindane, A.M. (2012). Governance and public leadership: The missing links in service delivery in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 47(3), 695-705.
Ndebele, C. & Lavhelani, P.N. (2017). Local government and quality service delivery: an evaluation of municipal service delivery in a local municipality in Limpopo Province. Journal of Public Administration, 52(2), 340-356
Ndevu, Z. & Muller, K. (2017). A conceptual framework for improving service delivery at local government in South Africa. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(7), 13-24.
Ndudula, M. R. (2013). An analysis of the politics-administrative interface and its impact on delivery of municipal services: A case of the Mnquma local municipality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare).
Nkomo, S. (2017). Public service delivery in South Africa: Councillors and citizens critical links in overcoming persistent inequities. Afrobarometer Policy, 42.
Nkomo, S. 2017. Public Service Delivery in South Africa: Councillors and Citizens Critical Links in Overcoming Persistent Inequities.
O'Neill, P. M. (2010). Infrastructure financing and operation in the contemporary city. Geographical research, 48(1), 3-12.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks. Cal.: Sage Publications, 4.
Rao, K., (2017). GIS Data Models and Spatial Data Structure: Unit 5, 22.
Reddy, P.S. (2016). The politics of service delivery in South Africa: The local government sphere in context. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa 12(1).
Regoniel, P. A. (2015). Conceptual framework: A step-by-step guide on how to make one. Simply Educate. Me. https://simplyeducate.me/2015/01/05/conceptual-framework-guide/
Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Government Printers, Pretoria.
Robin, T.A, Khan, M.A., Kabir, N., Rahaman, S.K.T., Karim, A., Mannan, I.I., George, J., & Rashid, J. (2019). Using spatial analysis and GIS to improve planning and resource allocation in a rural district of Bangladesh. BMJ Glob Health, 4.
Rushton, S. (2014). The Answer Series: Geography 3 in 1.
Saladin, M., Butler, D., & Parkinson, J. (2002). Applications of geographic information systems for Municipal Planning and Management in India. The Journal of Environment & Development, 11(4), 430-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496502238665
Sebola, M.P. (2018). The South African public service and the ethical problematics: the discipline and practice-talking different tongues. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 57-67.
Serrat, O. (2017). Knowledge solutions: Tools, methods, and approaches to drive organizational performance (p. 1140). Springer Nature.
Senyakoe, P. (2011). The challenges of financing municipalities' water and sanitation infrastructure by a development finance institution (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
StatsSA. (2018). Youth unemployment is still high in Q1: 2018. Statistics South Africa.
Sunday, N. D., & Mamokhere, J. (2021). The impact of the student-lecturer relationship on good decision-making and quality promotion in the institutions of higher education and training. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching & Learning, 5(2), 136–147.
Thabang, T., Makhanya, B., & Nel, H. (2022). Exploring Factors Delaying Public Service Delivery in South African Local Government. Proceedings of the First Australian International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Sydney, Australia, December 20-21, 2022. Pages 440 – 449.
Thornhill, C. & Dlamini, K. (2012). Councillor’s role in service delivery: The case study of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan municipality. African Journal of Public Affairs, 5(3), 36-41.
Tsheola, J.P., Ramonyai, N.P. & Segage, M. (2014). Twenty years of faltering democracy: service delivery planning and public participation in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 49(1), 392-405.
UN-HABITAT. (2016). Urbanization and development: Emerging futures – world cities report. Nairobi: UN-Habitat.
United Nations Development Group (2015). UNDAF Companion Guidance: Theory of Change. UNDG. New York.
Van Tulder, R. and Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
Viitanen, J., & Kingston, R. (2009). The role of public participation GIS in local service delivery. In Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-Government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies (pp. 611-630). IGI Global.
Wong, L. P. (2008). Data analysis in qualitative research: A brief guide to using NVivo. Malaysian family physician: the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 3(1), 14.
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 0 times
- 0 times
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kamogelo Racheku, France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
