Showcasing the Governance Assessment Tool as an “effective” contextual approach to water governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/jgrcs.v5i2.2712Keywords:
Water Management, Effective Governance, wastewater policy, underground water, governance evaluationAbstract
Addressing water challenges requires policies tailored to their governance context. The lack of such consideration is among the reasons why decentralisation, privatisation, and integrated water resources management have not achieved their intended outcomes. The Governance Assessment Tool (GAT) helps improve the effectiveness of water policies. GAT assesses how effective the implementation of water policies is and helps to develop policy recommendations to improve the effectiveness of the policy. As the purpose of this paper is to showcase the capabilities of GAT, we present its application in two different governance contexts (Iran and Mexico) to the European one where GAT was created. In our case selection, we focus on different challenges in water services (water supply and sanitation). In Iran, it is a single case study that assesses the groundwater policy, and in Mexico, it is a comparative case study of three sub-basins where the wastewater treatment plant policy is assessed. For each case, the results provide insights for improving policy effectiveness, such as the need for farmer participation in Iran and the need to enhance coordination by subnational governments in Mexico. These results showcase the GAT capability to assessing in-depth single case studies (Iran) and comparative analysis (Mexico). Moreover, GAT allows systematisation to navigate our understanding of complex challenges and provides a framework for academic and practitioners to understand the context and to propose tailored policies.
References
Aguilar-Barajas, I., Sisto, N. and Ramírez Orozco, A. (2015) Agua para Monterrey. Logros, retos y oportunidades para Nuevo León y México. Edited by S.A. de C.V. r Agencia Promotora de Publicaciones. Mexico: r Agencia Promotora de Publicaciones, S.A. de C.V. Available at: https://www.sadm.gob.mx/PortalSadm/Docs/aguaparamonterrey-media.pdf.
Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) ‘Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), pp. 543–571. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Boer de, C. and Bressers, H. (2011) Complex and dynamic implementation processes: the renaturalization of the Dutch Regge River. Enscehde: Universiteit Twente in collaboration with the Dutch Water Governance Centre.
Bressers, H. et al. (2015) Benefit of governance in drought adaptation: Governance assessment guide. Edited by H. Bressers and N. Bressers. DROP project European Union.
Bressers, H. et al. (2016) ‘The Governance Assessment Tool and its Use’, in H. Bressers, N. Bressers, and C. Larrue (eds) Governance for Drought Resilience. Springer International Publishing.
Bressers, H. and Kuks, S. (2004) Integrated Governance and Water Basin Management: Conditions for regime change towards sustainability. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 265. Available at: http://doc.utwente.nl/48981/.
Bressers, H. and Kuks, S. (2013) ‘Water governance regimes: Dimensions and dynamics’, International Journal of Water Governance, 1(1), pp. 133–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7564/12-IJWG1.
Cacal, J.C. and Taboada, E.B. (2022) ‘Assessment and Evaluation of IWRM Implementation in Palawan, Philippines’, Civil Engineering Journal, 8(2), pp. 290–307. Available at: https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-02-08.
Casiano Flores, C. (2017) Context Matters: Water Governance Assessment of the Wastewater Treatment Plant Policy in Central Mexico, CSTM. University of Twente. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036543224.
Casiano Flores, C. et al. (2019) ‘The state as a stimulator of wastewater treatment policy: a comparative assessment of three subnational cases in central Mexico’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1566060.
Casiano Flores, C. (2023) ‘Toward a contextualized research agenda: Governance challenges of the wastewater treatment policy in Mexico and the role of subnational governments’, WIREs Water [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1617.
Casiano Flores, C. and Crompvoets, J. (2020) ‘Assessing the Governance Context Support for Creating a Pluvial Flood Risk Map with Climate Change Scenarios: The Flemish Subnational Case’, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), p. 460. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070460.
Casiano Flores, C., Vikolainen, V. and Bressers, H. (2016) ‘Water Governance Decentralisation and River Basin Management Reforms in Hierarchical Systems: Do They Work for Water Treatment Policy in Mexico’s Tlaxcala Atoyac Sub-Basin?’, Water, 8(5), pp. 210–210.
Connell, A., St Denny, E. and Martin, S. (2022) ‘How can subnational governments develop and deliver distinctive policy agendas?’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), pp. 1159–1175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852321996429.
Giordano, M. (2009) ‘Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), pp. 153–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.100251.
Gjaltema, J., Biesbroek, R. and Termeer, K. (2020) ‘From government to governance…to meta-governance: a systematic literature review’, Public Management Review, 22(12), pp. 1760–1780. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697.
Happaerts, S., Bruyninckx, H. and Van den Brande, K. (2012) ‘Introduction’, in H. Bruyninckx, S. Happaerts, and K. van den Brande (eds) Sustainable Development and Subnational Governments Policy-Making and Multi-Level Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 1–24.
Howlett, M. (2019) Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. 2nd edn. Second edition. | Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis group, an informa business, 2019.: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232003.
IMCO (2014) Guía para la creación de organismos metropolitanos de agua potable y saneamiento en México. Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad and Embajada Británica en México. Available at: http://imco.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/AguaPotable.pdf.
Indset, M. (2023) ‘When multilevel water management meets regional government: the differential impacts on administrative integration’, Environmental Politics, 32(2), pp. 271–293. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2066344.
Jordan, A. (2000) ‘The Politics of Multilevel Environmental Governance: Subsidiarity and Environmental Policy in the European Union’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(7), pp. 1307–1324. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1068/a3211.
Jörgensen, K., Jogesh, A. and Mishra, A. (2015) ‘Multi-level climate governance and the role of the subnational level’, Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2015.1096797.
Lordkipanidze, M., Bressers, H. and Lulofs, K. (2019) ‘Governance assessment of a protected area: the case of the Alde Feanen National Park’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(4), pp. 647–670. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1441014.
Mirnezami, S.J., De Boer, C. and Bagheri, A. (2020) ‘Groundwater governance and implementing the conservation policy: the case study of Rafsanjan Plain in Iran’, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(8), pp. 8183–8210. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00488-0.
Mirnezami, S.J. l and Bagheri, A. (2017) ‘Assessing the water governance system for groundwater conservation in Iran’, Iran-Water Resources Research, 13(2), pp. 32–55.
Nabavi, E. (2017) ‘(Ground)Water Governance and Legal Development in Iran, 1906–2016’, Middle East Law and Governance, 9(1), pp. 43–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763375-00901005.
Noori, R. et al. (2021) ‘Anthropogenic depletion of Iran’s aquifers’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(25), p. e2024221118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024221118.
Noori, R. et al. (2023) ‘Decline in Iran’s Groundwater Recharge’. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2608948/v1.
OECD (2018) OECD Water Governance Indicator Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/regional/OECD-Water-Governance-Indicator-Framework.pdf.
OECD (2019a) Governance as an SDG Accelerator. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/0666b085-en.
OECD (2019b) Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/a90f851f-en.
Özerol, G. and Bressers, H. (2023) ‘Enhancing the resilience of midsize cities to climate extremes: A tool for practitioners to assess their governance context’, Total Environment Research Themes, 8, p. 100080. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.totert.2023.100080.
Pacheco-Vega, R. (2015a) ‘Gobernanza del agua residual en Aguascalientes: captura regulatoria y arreglos institucionales complejos’, Región y Sociedad, XXVII(64), pp. 313–350.
Pacheco-Vega, R. (2015b) ‘Urban wastewater governance in Latin America’, in I. Aguilar-Barajas et al. (eds) Water and Cities in Latin America: Challenges for Latin America. London: Earthscan/Taylor and Francis, pp. 102–108.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) ‘A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes’, Global Environmental Change, 19(3), pp. 354–365. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.
Pahl-Wostl, C. et al. (2010) ‘Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework’, Environmental Science & Policy, 13(7), pp. 571–581. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006.
Van Rijswick, M. et al. (2014) ‘Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: An integrated method to assess the governance of water’, Water International, 39(5), pp. 725–742. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2014.951828.
Thiel, A. and Egerton, C. (2011) ‘Re-scaling of Resource Governance as institutional change: The case of water governance in Portugal’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(3), pp. 383–402. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.507936.
Trein, P., Meyer, I. and Maggetti, M. (2019) ‘The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), pp. 332–349. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2018.1496667.
UNESCO (2024) UNITED NATIONS WORLD WATER DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2024: water for prosperity and peace. S.l.: UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONA.
United Nations (2021a) The United Nations World Water Development Report 2021: Valuing Water. Paris.
United Nations (2021b) UN-Water SDG 6 Data Portal- Mexico. Available at: https://sdg6data.org/country-or-area/Mexico#anchor_6.b.1 (Accessed: 20 July 2021).
Downloads
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cesar Casiano Flores, Jalal Mirnezami, Hans Bressers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability (JGRCS) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Journal of Governance Risk Management Compliance and Sustainability may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
