Applied Quantitative Analysis: An inaugural statement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/quant.656Keywords:
wheel of science, formal science, natural science, social science, quantitative researchAbstract
This article marks the inaugural of Applied Quantitative Analysis (AQA) journal. It is founded on the idea of numbers as the first and foremost mathematical object that act as the harbinger of all meaning. The journal aims to provide a medium for researchers and practitioners to exchange and disseminate their theoretical and practical works that employ quantitative analysis methods to their furthest extent. The journal covers research topics and themes in the three branches of sciences (i.e., formal science, natural science, and social science). In addition to discipline-specific studies, the AQA journal encourages multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary works. Basically, this journal accepts manuscript submissions as Research, Review, Method, Commentary, or Book Review articles. For the submission, each article type has its own general structure and particular requirements. On the other hand, this journal continuously establishes its diverse Editorial Board by inviting experienced scholars in the applied quantitative analysis area from different disciplines and geographical locations. As a focal point of publications among quantitative scholars, the journal invites quantitative scientists and researchers to join as reviewers to ensure the solid quality of published papers.
References
Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015). Defining the Anthropocene. Nature, 519, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers.
van Vuuren, D. P., Riahi, K., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Emmerling, J., Fujimori, S., KC, S., Kriegler, E., & O’Neill, B. (2017). The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.10.009
Münster, R. (2020). The Anthropocene, Technology and Fictional Literature. Humanities, 9(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9030056
Wamsler, C. (2013). Managing risk: From the United Nations to local-level realities - or vice versa. Climate and Development, 5(3), 253–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2013.825203
Foucault, M. (1978). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Vintage Books.
Guedj, D. (1996). Numbers: The Universal Language. Éditions Gallimard.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica (vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The Logic of Modern Physics. Macmillan.
Frege, G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Koebner.
Russell, B. (1920). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (2nd ed.). George Allen & Unwin.
Ridgeway, W. (1896). What led Pythagoras to the doctrine that the world was built of numbers? The Classical Review, 10(2), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00203296
Black, M. (1933). The Nature of Mathematics: A Critical Survey. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co Ltd.
Thanasegaran, G. (2009). Reliability and validity issues in research. Integration & Dissemination, 4, 35–40.
Wallace, W. L. (1971). The Logic of Science in Sociology. Aldine.
Holton, G. (1960). Modern science and the intellectual tradition. Science, 131(3408), 1187–1193.
Render, B., Stair Jr., R. M., & Hanna, M. E. (2012). Quantitative Analysis for Management (11th ed.). Pearson Education India.
Härdle, W. K., Chen, C. Y.-H., & Overbeck, L. (2017). Applied Quantitative Finance (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54486-0
Anderson, S. W., & Widener, S. K. (2006). Doing Quantitative Field Research in Management Accounting. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research (Vol. 1, pp. 319–341). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01012-1
Petscher, Y. M., Schatschneider, C., & Compton, D. L. (2013). Applied Quantitative Analysis in Education and the Social Sciences. Routledge.
Baggio, R., & Klobas, J. (2017). Quantitative Methods in Tourism (2nd ed.). Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845416201
Franses, P. H., & Paap, R. (2004). Quantitative Models in Marketing Research (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Murray, A. T. (2010). Quantitative geography. Journal of Regional Science, 50(1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00642.x
Weil, J. (2017). Research Design in Aging and Social Gerontology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315450162
Purpura, J. E., Brown, J. D., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Improving the validity of quantitative measures in applied linguistics research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 37–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12112
Rice, S. A. (1928). Quantitative Methods in Politics. Knopf.
Finkelstein, M. O. (1978). Quantitative Methods in Law: Studies in the Application of Mathematical Probability and Statistics to Legal Problems. Free Press.
Lewis, D. (1960). Quantitative Methods in Psychology. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/11626-000
Blalock, H. M. (1989). The real and unrealized contributions of quantitative sociology. American Sociological Review, 54(3), 447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095616
Furet, F. (1971). Quantitative history. Daedalus, 100(1), 151–167.
Mulder, M. B., Caro, T. M., Chrisholm, J. S., Dumont, J.-P., Hall, R. L., Hinde, R. A., & Ohtsuka, R. (1985). The use of quantitative observational techniques in anthropology [and comments and replies]. Current Anthropology, 26(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/203277
Barr, S. M. (2006). A Students Guide to Natural Science. Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
Simhony, M. (1994). Invitation to the Natural Physics of Matter, Space, and Radiation. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/2254
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Gates, S. (2002). Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71(4), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00634.x
Meyer, D. E., Mehlman, D. W., Reeves, E. S., Origoni, R. B., Evans, D., & Sellers, D. W. (1983). Comparison study of overlap among 21 scientific databases in searching pesticide information. Online Review, 7(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024120
Salamin, X., & Hanappi, D. (2014). Women and international assignments: a systematic literature review exploring textual data by Correspondence Analysis. Journal of Global Mobility, 2(3), 343–374.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-09-2013-0058
Cipresso, P., Giglioli, I. A. C., Raya, M. A., & Riva, G. (2018). The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: A network and cluster analysis of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02086
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 67 times
- 126 times
