Peer Review Process

The suitability of manuscripts for publication in Applied Quantitative Analysis (AQA) is judged by peer reviewers and the editorial board. All the review processes are conducted in a double-blind review where both authors and reviewers' identities remain anonymous. The editor-in-chief and Editorial board arrange editorial meetings together to make the final decision as to whether the paper is recommended for acceptance or rejection for each edition.

The editor in chief and editorial board will evaluate the submitted papers on the prequalification step to determine whether they are suitable for further review. The manuscripts will be evaluated by qualified peer reviewers selected by the Editor in Chief and editorial board. The peer reviewers should examine the manuscript and return it with their recommendation to the journal as soon as possible, usually within 3 weeks.

Papers needing revision will be returned to the authors, and the author must return the revised manuscript to the via OJS of AQA. The editor-in-chief sends the revised manuscript to the Editorial Board to check whether the manuscript is revised as suggested by peer reviewers. The Editorial Board could give a recommendation to the editor-in-chief that the manuscript should return to the authors, accepted or rejected within at least two weeks. They can also arrange editorial meetings to discuss accepted, rejected or potential manuscripts in each edition. The editor in chief would send an acceptance letter (LoA) announcing the publication issue to the authors before publication.

After the LoA release by the decision of the editorial meeting, the manuscript will go to the language editor to check for readability and grammar. After the language editing process, the journal manager will prepare for layout and publishing as well as the publication schedule in the Open Journal System (OJS).

Review Speed/Acceptance

Welcome to our scientific journal's dedicated page on the review process timeline, where transparency and efficiency are at the forefront of our commitment to advancing scholarly research. From the initial submission to the publication of accepted manuscripts, we strive to provide a clear and concise overview of the various stages involved in bringing valuable contributions to the scientific community.

At every step of this timeline, we are committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing, fostering collaboration, and contributing to the collective advancement of knowledge. We invite you to navigate through our journal's review process, confident that your research is in capable hands.