Bibliometric Analysis to A Future Research Direction on Agile Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v6i2.1381Keywords:
Bibliometric Analysis, Agile Transformation, Scopus DatabaseAbstract
Agile transformation has become increasingly popular as a management approach to improve performance, but there has been limited research on its direction. This study aims to advance knowledge on agile transformation to help companies become faster, more flexible, and more responsive. The study employs a bibliometric approach to analyze 116 "Agile Transformation" papers published in the Scopus database over the past 20 years. The findings indicate an increasing number of publications in recent years, with the United States, Finland, and Germany being the top countries. However, the research connections are not yet consolidated, as only 22 authors out of 282 have co-authored papers. The research has also been mainly focused on software development and IT companies, using case studies, grounded theory, and surveys. The study reveals that the major research hotspots in the agile transformation are agile transformation, software development, software design, agile methods, agile transition, and agile adoption. The grand theories emerging in the Agile Transformation revolution emphasize the importance of collaboration, communication, continuous improvement, and customer value. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research on agile transformation and offers insights for future research. The findings highlight the need for greater research diversity beyond software development and IT companies and an opportunity to use action research and ethnography strategies to understand agile transformation. Ultimately, this study contributes to the advancement of knowledge on agile transformation and its role in improving organizational performance.
Downloads
References
Akbar, M. A., Shad, M. K., Lai, F.-W., & Hussain, S. (2020). Towards successful agile development process in software outsourcing environment: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 23(2), 267–282. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2020.110101
Altuwaijri, F. S., & Ferrario, M. A. (2022). Factors affecting Agile adoption: An industry research study of the mobile app sector in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Systems and Software, 190, 111347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111347
Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2005). Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Software, 22(5), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2005.129
Cram, W. A., & Newell, S. (2016). Mindful revolution or mindless trend? Examining agile development as a management fashion. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 154–169. ABI/INFORM Collection. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2015.13
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
Dingsøyr, T., & Moe, N. B. (2014). Towards principles of large-scale agile development: A summary of the workshop at XP2014 and a revised research Agenda. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 199, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_1
Dove, R. (1995). 1995Dove-MeasuringAgilityTollOfTurmoil.pdf. Steven Institute of Technology.
Dyba, T., & Dingsoyr, T. (2009). What do we know about agile software development? IEEE Software, 26(5), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2009.145
Gahroee, T. M., Gandomani, T. J., & Aghaei, M. S. (2022). The main pillars of Agile consolidation in newly Agile teams in Agile software development. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 26(2), 1216–1226. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i2.pp1216-1226
Gandomani, T. J., Zulzalil, H., Ghani, A. A. A., & Md. Sultan, A. B. (2013). Towards Comprehensive and Disciplined Change Management Strategy in Agile Transformation Process. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(13), 2345–2351. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.3706
Geyi, D. G., Yusuf, Y., Menhat, M. S., Abubakar, T., & Ogbuke, N. J. (2020). Agile capabilities as necessary conditions for maximising sustainable supply chain performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 222(August 2019), 107501–107501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.022
Goldman, S. L., R.N., N., & K., & P. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gren, L., Torkar, R., & Feldt, R. (2017). Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies. Journal of Systems and Software, 124, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.024
Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational-agilityJournal-of-Applied-Business-Research.pdf.
Javdani Gandomani, T., & Ziaei Nafchi, M. (2015). An empirically-developed framework for Agile transition and adoption: A Grounded Theory approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 107, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.006
Javdani Gandomani, T., & Ziaei Nafchi, M. (2016). Agile transition and adoption human-related challenges and issues: A Grounded Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.009
Kim, E., & Ryoo, S. (2012). Agile adoption story from NHN. Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference, 476–481. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2012.83
Laanti, M., Salo, O., & Abrahamsson, P. (2011). Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: A survey of opinions on agile transformation. Information and Software Technology, 53(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.11.010
Mishra, D., & Mishra, A. (2011). Complex software project development: Agile methods adoption. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 23(8), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.528
Muhuri, P. K., Shukla, A. K., & Abraham, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78(December 2018), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007
Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018). Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: A case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(5), 2550–2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8
Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2014). Communities of practice in a large distributed agile software development organization – Case Ericsson. Special Issue: Human Factors in Software Development, 56(12), 1556–1577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.06.008
Petersen, K., & Wohlin, C. (2010). The effect of moving from a plan-driven to an incremental software development approach with agile practices: An industrial case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 15(6), 654–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9136-6
Pinho, C. R. A., Pinho, M. L. C. A., Deligonul, S. Z., & Tamer Cavusgil, S. (2022). The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment. Journal of Business Research, 153(September), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.011
Pinton, M., & Torres, A. S. (2020). Human aspects of agile transition in traditional organizations. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 15(3), 62–73.
Poth, A., Kottke, M., & Riel, A. (2020). Evaluation of agile team work quality: Vol. 396 LNBIP (P. M. & K. P., Eds.; p. 110). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58858-8_11
Poth, A., Kottke, M., & Riel, A. (2021). Measuring teamwork quality in large-scale agile organisations evaluation and integration of the aTWQ approach. IET Software, 15(6), 443–452. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2.12036
Prange, C., & Hennig, A. (2019). From Strategic Planning to Strategic Agility Patterns. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319867778
Qumer, A., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2008). A framework to support the evaluation, adoption and improvement of agile methods in practice. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(11), 1899–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.806
Ragazou, K., Passas, I., Garefalakis, A., & Dimou, I. (2022). Investigating the Research Trends on Strategic Ambidexterity, Agility, and Open Innovation in SMEs: Perceptions from Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030118
Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
Shaharudin, M. S., Fernando, Y., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sroufe, R., & Jasmi, M. F. A. (2019). Past, present, and future low carbon supply chain management: A content review using social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.016
Sidky, A., Arthur, J., & Bohner, S. (2007). A disciplined approach to adopting agile practices: The agile adoption framework. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 3(3), 203–216. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0026-z
Strode, D. E., Sharp, H., Barroca, L., Gregory, P., & Taylor, K. (2022). Tensions in Organizations Transforming to Agility. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 3572–3583. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3160415
Vejseli, S., & Rossmann, A. (2018). Towards agility in IT governance frameworks (A. W. & P. A., Eds.; Vol. 320, p. 85). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_6
Winkelhake, U. (2017). The Digital Transformation of the Automotive Industry: Catalysts, Roadmap, Practice. In The Digital Transformation of the Automotive Industry: Catalysts, Roadmap, Practice (p. 313). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71610-7
Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010314818
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 0 times
- 0 times
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sidik Darusulistyo, Dermawan Wibisono, Harimukti Wandebori, Santi Novani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice: 1. License
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article,
the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
