Perception and Practices of Teaching Grammar in Higher Secondary Schools in Bhutan.

Authors

  • Nima Wangchuk Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan., Bhutan
  • Chencho Wangchuk Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan
  • Dhanapati Sharma Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan
  • Phub Dorji Gedu College of Business Studies, Royal University of Bhutan, Bhutan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v1i1.453

Keywords:

Context-based, Isolated units, Explicitly, Implicitly, Focus on form.

Abstract

This paper reports a survey of Bhutanese teachers’ Perception and Practices of Teaching Grammar in Higher Secondary Schools in Bhutan. The teaching of grammar in Bhutanese school is predominately guided by curriculum, whereby context-based teaching is mostly encouraged. The descriptive analysis based on quantitative findings of the study indicated that Bhutanese teachers generally believed that the formal study of grammar is essential to the eventual mastery of a foreign or second language.  The study also showed that grammar is generally believed to be best taught explicitly, inductively or deductively, but not implicitly. Moreover, the teachers' remark on the importance of systematic practice of grammatical features and detailed error correction suggests that there is a preference for more extensive treatment of grammatical issues.  The findings of the present study also indicate that, like the teachers reported in the 2002 and 2008 studies, teachers in Bhutan appreciate the centrality of grammar in their language teaching. This descriptive analysis based on quantitative findings would be beneficial to the curriculum developers, teachers, and lecturers in developing students’ grammar skills and providing professional development to teachers for effective delivery of grammar lessons

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asselin, M. (2002, June). Teaching grammar (Literacy links). Teacher Librarian, 29(5), 52-54.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London, UK: Continuum.

Borg. S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in Adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 456-482.

Breznak, R., & Scott, J. (2003, December). Grouping students to teach grammar. Education Digest, 69(4), 58-61.

Brown, A. (1996, November). Correct grammar so essential to effective writing can be taught-really! English Journal, 98-101

Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: Explicit or implicit? System, 30, 433-458.

Canh, L. V., & Barnard, R. (2009). Teaching grammar: A survey of teachers’ attitudes in Vietnam. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(3), 245-273

Doniger, P. E. (2003, January). Language matters: Grammar as a tool in the teaching of literature. English Journal, 101-104.

Ezzaher, L. E. (2001). From a grammar of sentences to a grammar of texts: Thought and impressions on grammar and writing. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(2),90.

Gibben, B. (1996, November). The role of generalization in studying grammar and usage. English Journal, 55-58.

Hagemann, J. A. (2003, January). Balancing content and form in the writing workshop. English Journal, 73-79

Haussamen, B. (2003). Grammar Alive. Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English

Hayes, J. (2003, March). Planning and teaching report-writing. Primary English Teaching Association, Marricksville, Australia.

Hoffman, M. J. (2006). More grammar gaps. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(1),220-226.

Johansen, D., & Shaw N. L. (2003, January). The glossing process as a practical approach to grammar instruction. English Journal, 97-100.

Joseph, P. B. et al. (2000). Cultures of curriculum. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Lacina, J. (2005). Grammar instruction and technology (Technology in the classroom). Childhood Education, 81(4), 247-250.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997, March). Grammar and its teaching: Challenging the myths.

Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Long, H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15- 41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, S. L. (2005, March). Forging ourselves and forging ahead: Teaching grammar in a new millennium. English Journal, 70-75.

Oldenburg, S. (2005). Grammar in the student-centered composition class. Radical Teacher, 75, 43-44.

Petruzzela, B. A. (1996, November). Grammar instruction: What teachers say. English Journal, 68-73.

Sams, L. (2003, January). How to teach grammar, analytical thinking, and writing: A method that works. English Journal, 57-65.

Sipe R. B. (2006, May). Grammar matters. English Journal, 15-17.

Thomas, P. L. (2001, September). Standards, standards everywhere, and not a spot to think. English Journal, 63-67.

Thompson, M. C. (2002). Vocabulary and grammar: Critical content for critical thinking. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 13(2), 60-68.

Weaver, C. (1996, November). Teaching grammar in the context of writing. English Journal, 15-24.

Yates, R., & Kenkel, J. (2001). On the dysfunctional nature of systemic functional grammar (Language teaching & learning). Academic Exchange Quarterly, 5(3),100-106.

Downloads

Article Metrics

Published

March 27, 2021

Citation Check

How to Cite

Wangchuk, N., Wangchuk, C. ., Sharma, D. ., & Dorji, P. . (2021). Perception and Practices of Teaching Grammar in Higher Secondary Schools in Bhutan . Journal of English As A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v1i1.453

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Article Index