Collaborative Learning for Enhancing Student Academic Achievement in Online Grammar Class: an Experimental Study

Authors

  • Setya Ariani Mulawarman University
  • Nita Maya Valiantien Mulawarman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v2i1.841

Keywords:

Collaborative learning, online learning, achievement, grammar pretest and posttest

Abstract

Collaborative learning is an activity to work in small groups or teams that allows students to develop mutual cooperation in learning. This study aims to highlight the effectiveness of collaborative learning in improving student academic achievement. It was carried out with a quantitative method and the pretest-posttest experimental design was applied. There were sixty students participated in this study. To assess students’ achievement, online grammar pretest and posttest were distributed. In addition, collaborative learning questionnaire was administered to elicit students’ responses towards collaborative learning. Based on paired-samples t test result, it was found that the pretest and posttest mean scores were significantly different (t(59) = -5.977, p < .05).  This indicated that there was a higher mean score of posttest after the implementation of collaborative activities. Most students responded that collaborative learning activities improved academic performance and team work helped them to receive input from their peers as well as provide better result in completing the tasks than working individually.  It is recommended that various collaborative activities should be designed to motivate university students in learning grammar.

References

Alsubaie, J & Ashuraidah, A. (2017). Exploring writin individually and collaboratively using Google Docs in EFL Contexts, English Language Teaching, 10 (10), 10 – 30.

Andres, H., & Shipps, B. 2010. Team learning in technology-mediated distributed teams. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21(2), 213-221.

Barkley, E.F., Cross, K.P., & Major, C.H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bélanger, M. (2012). Online collaborative learning. (Retrieved on June 28, 2021 from http://training.itcilo.it/actrav/library/english/publications/online_cl.doc).

Chatterjee, R. (2015). Exploring the relationship between attitude towards collaborative learning and sense of community among college students in online learning environments: A correlational study. Thesis. Iowa State University.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, 1-19.

Faja, S. (2013). Collaborative learning in online courses: Exploring students’ perceptions. Information Systems Education Journal (ISEDJ), 11 (3): 42 – 51.

Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in-group support system research, Decision Support Systems, 37 (2), 239-263.

Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P.C., & González-Sanmamed, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions of online collaborative learning. Proceedings of INTED2015 Conference, 3675- 3682. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297918384.

Hoppe, D. (2016). Trad vs non-trad internet-hybrid report for fall 2015. Unpublished raw data.

Khalil, Z.M. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions towards using Google Docs and Google Classroom as online collaborative tools in learning grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2):33–48, DOI: 10.14744/alrj.2018.47955.

Koh, M. & Hill, J. 2009. Student perceptions of group work in an online course: Benefits and challenges, Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 69-92.

Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., & Coric, A. (2012). Mobilising students’ grammar skills through collaborative e-tivities with Web 2.0 tools, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 34 : 132 – 136.

Kumar, R. (2017). The effect of collaborative learning on enhancing student achievement: A meta-analysis. A thesis. Concordia University: School of Graduate Studies.

Lee, S.,Bonk, C., Magjuka, R., Su, B., & Liu, X. (2006). Understanding the dimensions of virtual teams. International Journal on ELearning, 5(4), 507-523.

Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product.

Computers and Education, 40, 377-391.

Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Ollendick, T. & Schroeder, C.S. (2003). Encyclopedia of clinical child and pediatric psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Panitz, T. (1999). Collaborative versus Cooperative Learning: A Comparison of the two concepts which will help us understand the underlying nature of interactive learning. (Retrieved on June 26, 2021 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED448443.pdf).

Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., & Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronus online discussions as a tool for learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16 (4), 409-430.

Pintrich, P.R., Smith,D.A.F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA.

Schmid, R.F., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R.M., Abrami, P.C., Surkes, M.A., et al. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: a meta-analysis of classroom applications, Computers & Education, 72, 271- 291.

Stoytcheva, M. (2018). Students’ Perceptions of Online Collaboration in a Distance Learning French Language Course. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Applications of Mathematics in Engineering and Economics, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5082048.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-31

How to Cite

Ariani, S., & Valiantien, N. M. . (2022). Collaborative Learning for Enhancing Student Academic Achievement in Online Grammar Class: an Experimental Study. Journal of English As A Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v2i1.841

Issue

Section

Articles