Social Entrepreneurship Model Based on Quadruple Helix Collaboration: Economic Empowerment in Disabilities Community
(Editorial Article)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/jsetp.v1i1.647Keywords:
Conceptual model, Disability communities, Quadruple helix, Social entrepreneurship, Value co-creationAbstract
Social entrepreneurship is a process of continuous innovation in classifying different social problems to overcome social problems and meet social needs. The social entrepreneurship approach is very promising in creating new opportunities for individuals with disabilities in the emerging industry. The conceptual contribution to developing a theory that explains the relationship between constructions has been less underlined. Thus, this study aims to identify different models and how they work and propose a conceptual model of social entrepreneurship to empower the economy in disability communities. This study uses descriptive analysis by conducting various literature syntheses to understand the contribution of entrepreneurship in social development. Based on discussion and analysis, new model propositions consider the value of co-creation stakeholders and supporting ecosystems such as academics, government, profit, and non-profit organizations and communities (quadruple helix concept). Overall, this study provides a conceptual framework that enables an understanding of the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship growth and its role in empowering community disabilities. Also, this research also tries to facilitate the stakeholders involved to contribute to the empowerment of community disabilities.
Downloads
References
Barnes, C., and Mercer, G., 2010. Exploring Disability. Polity Press, Cambridge.
Baron, R. A., 2000. Social capital. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bejtkovsky J., Rozsa Z., Mulyaningsih D.H. 2018. A Phenomenon of Digitalization and E-Recruitment in Business Environment. Polish Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 18. No.1
Bornstein, D., 2007. How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford University Press.
Brooks, C. A., 2009. Social Entrepreneurship: A Modern Approach to Social Value Creation. Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey.
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F., 2009. 'Mode 3'and'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st-century fractal innovation ecosystem. International journal of technology management, 46(3-4), p. 201-234.
Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F., 2010. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1(1), p. 41–69.
Coleridge, P., 1993. Disability, liberation, and development. Oxfam Central Bureau of Statistics., Social dan Kependudukan. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/index.php, accessed November 27, 2017.
Central Bureau of Statistics, BPS Dukung Hak Penyandang Disabilities. Badan Pusat Statistik, Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/index.php/kegiatanLain/91, accessed November 27, 2017.
Creswell, J.W. ( 2009). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications Inc. London
Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of management journal, 34(3), p. 555-590.
Dees, J. G., 1998. Enterprising Non-Profits. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No.1 p. 55-66.
.
Draskovic, M ., Delibasic, M., Ivic, M., Oksana, C. 2017. Preference of Institutional Changes in Social and Economic Development. Journal of International Studies. Vol. 10. No. 2.
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., and Nelson, R. R. (Eds.)., 2005. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford university press.
Farinha, L., and Ferreira, J. J., 2011. Triangulation of the triple helix: a conceptual framework. University of Beira Interior, 25.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., and Kyriakidou, O., 2004. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), p. 581-629.
Hulgård, L., 2010. Discourses of social entrepreneurship–Variations of the same theme. EMES European Research Network Johnson, S.,2000. Literature reviews on social entrepreneurship. Canadian Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, p. 16- 23.
International Labour Office, ILO and Disability Inclusion. ILO Publication, September 2005.
Jabareen, Y., 2009. Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of qualitative methods, 8(4), p. 49-62.
Jones, A. L., Warner, B., and Kiser, P. M., 2010. Social entrepreneurship. Planning for Higher Education, 38(4) p. 44.
Kurbatov, V. L., Glagolev, S. N., and Fursova, S. A., 2013. The epistemological basis of innovations. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24(11), p. 1510-1518.
Kong, E., 2010. Innovation Process in Social Enterprises: an IC Perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 11, No.2 , p. 158-178.
Lacap, Jean PG., HD. Mulyaningsih., Veland, R. 2018. The Mediating Effects of Social Entrepreneurial Antecedents on the Relationship between Prior Experience and Social Entrepreneurial Intent: The Case of Filipino and Indonesian University Students. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. Vol. 9. Issue 3. Pp 329-346
Leydesdorff, L., and Meyer, M., 2006. Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, No. 35, Vol. 10, pp. 1441-1449.
LPEM FEB UI., 2017. Laporan Akhir Memetakan Penyandang Dsabilitas (PD) di Pasar Tenaga Kerja Indonesia. Organisasi Perburuhan Internasional.
Liebowitz, J., 1999. Knowledge management handbook. CRC Press, USA.
Martin, R.L., and Osberg, S., 2007. Social Entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review Spring: 29-39.
Mulyaningsih, H. D., Yudoko, G., and Rudito, B., 2014. Initial Conceptual Model of Knowledge-Based Social Innovation. World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 30 .p. 256-262.
Mulyaningsih, H. D., 2015. Enhancing innovation in quadruple helix perspective: The case of the business incubators in Indonesia. International Business Management, 9(4), p. 367-371.
Mulyaningsih, H.D., Gatot Yudoko and Bambang Rudito (2016). Knowledge-based Social Innovation in Social Enterprise: A conceptual framework. Advance Science Letter Vol. 22, No. 5/6 .May/June -2016
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., and Sanders, B., 2007. Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated — Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
MacGregor, S. P., Marques-Gou, P., and Simon-Villar, A., 2010. Gauging readiness for the quadruple helix: a study of 16 European organizations. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(3) p. 173-190.
Maldonado, V., Lobera, J., and Escrigas, C., 2009. The role of higher education in a new quadruple helix context. Triple Helix, 7, p. 17-19.
Nicholls, A., 2006. Social Entrepreneurship. In: Carter, Sara and Evans-Jones, Dylan, (eds.) Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Okpara, O. J., and Halkias, D., 2011. Social Entrepreneurship: An Overview of Its Theoretical Evolution and Proposed Research Model. International Journal Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Popov, Evgeny V ., Anna, YV and Ksenia, MK. 2018. Formal Institutional Environment Influence on Social Entrepreneurship in Developed Country. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Vol.14. No. 4. Page 045-156
Ramadani V., Leo-Paul D., Shqipe Gerguri-Rashiti., Vanessa R., 2017. Social Entrepreneurship and Management in Islamic Context. Springer, p. 143-158
Saunders, Mark and Philip Lewis. ( 2012). Doing Research in Businness and Management : An essential guide to planning your project. Prentice Hall – Pearson
Sen, G., and Grown, C., 1987. Development alternatives with women for a new era. London: Earthscan.
World Health Organization, 2011. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO.
World Economic Forum., 2015. Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship Annual Report 2014-2015. World Economic Forum, Switzerland.
Downloads
Article Metrics
- 0 times
- 235 times
