The Impact of Crew Resource Management Training on Operational Skill of Aircraft Operation Student: A Comparison Between Simulation-Based and Theoretical Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/lomr.v4i2.3237Keywords:
Crew Resource Management, FLOPS Simulator, Simulation-Based Learning, Theoretical LearningAbstract
Crew Resource Management (CRM) is a critical training method in aviation aimed at improving teamwork, communication, risk management, and decision-making to minimize human error, a significant contributor to aviation accidents. While theoretical training builds foundational knowledge, it often lacks practical application necessary to develop operational skills in real scenarios. This study compares CRM training through simulation using the FLOPS Simulator with traditional theoretical instruction, focusing on their impact on Aircraft Operations students’ skills. This quasi-experimental study investigated the effects of theoretical and simulation-based CRM training on operational skills among 24 Aircraft Operations students. Initial CRM knowledge was assessed through a theory test, followed by a first simulation to evaluate students practical CRM skills. Observations and interviews captured their challenges and experiences. A second simulation assessed improvements in operational skills, with data analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative insights from interviews. Results indicate that simulation-based CRM training significantly enhances operational skills, particularly in communication, teamwork, risk management, and decision-making, compared to theoretical training. Simulation provides a more immersive learning experience, allowing the application of CRM principles in near-real operational conditions. This study, conducted at a single institution, highlights the need for broader research involving multiple institutions and long-term assessments to further validate findings. By addressing gaps in CRM training, this research underscores the effectiveness of simulation in aviation education and its potential to improve CRM training practices
References
Arteaga, E., Biesbroek, R., Nalau, J., & Howes, M. (2024). Across the great divide: A systematic literature review to address the gap between theory and practice. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241228019
Bambang, S. (2010). Tobin’s Q and Altman Z-Score as indicators of performance measurement company.
EASA. Version 1. Crew resource management in practice. (2017).
ICAO. Doc 10106 manual on flight operations officers/flight dispatchers competency-based training and assessment. (2021).
Duncan, B. W., McDonald, K. M., Wachter, R. M., & Director Kathryn McDonald, P. M. (2001). Evidence report/technology assessment number 43 - Making health care safer: A critical analysis of patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov
Enterprise, A. (n.d.). AC 120-51D - Crew resource management training. Federal Aviation Administration. http://www.faa.gov/avr/afs/train.htm
Havinga, J., de Boer, R. J., Rae, A., & Dekker, S. W. A. (2017). How did crew resource management take off outside of the cockpit? A systematic review of how crew resource management training is conceptualized and evaluated for non-pilots. Safety, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/safety3040026
Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (n.d.). Crew resource management. Elsevier.
Lestari Nur Wibowo, U., Penerbang Indonesia Banyuwangi, A., Timur, J., Kunci, K., Officer, O., Penerbangan, K., & Pesawat Udara, O. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan laboratorium FOO dalam menunjang peningkatan pemahaman taruna OPU di Akademi Penerbang Indonesia Banyuwangi. Skyhawk: Jurnal Aviasi Indonesia, 1. http://ejournal.icpa-banyuwangi.ac.id/index.php/skyhawk
Midkiff, A., Hansman, J., & Reynolds, T. G. (2004). Air carrier flight operations. MIT International Center for Air Transportation.
Otto, F. (2018). Pemanfaatan flight simulator untuk meningkatkan kinerja pilot. Jurnal Educate.
Palupi, R., Yulianna, D. A., & Winarsih, S. S. (2021). Analisa perbandingan rumus haversine dan rumus euclidean berbasis sistem informasi geografis menggunakan metode independent sample t-test. JITU: Journal Informatic Technology and Communication, 5(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.36596/jitu.v5i1.494
Prayitno, H., Supardam, D., Qiram, I., & Arrafat, S. B. (n.d.). Pemanfaatan simulator terbang pada pendidikan vokasi penerbang dalam meningkatkan minat bakat taruna penerbang. Jurnal Ilmiah Aviasi, 16(2), 2745–8695. https://doi.org/10.54147/langitbiru.v16i02
Rustamana, A., Wahyuningsih, P., Azka, M. F., & Wahyu, P. (n.d.). Cendikia pendidikan penelitian metode kuantitatif. https://doi.org/10.9644/sindoro.v4i5.3317
Salas, E., Burke, S., Bowers, C. A., & Wilson, K. A. (n.d.). Team training in the skies: Does crew resource management (CRM) training work?
Salas, E., & Maurino, D. (n.d.). Human factors in aviation.
Standards, A. N. (2022). CASR Part 142 technical assessor handbook.
Wagener, F., & Ison, D. C. (2014). Crew resource management application in commercial aviation. Journal of Aviation Technology and Engineering, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/2159-6670.1077
Widiyoko, E. P. (2015). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan edisi 3. Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Downloads
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rico Darmawan, Fajar Islam, Prasetyo Iswahyudi, Kukuh Tri Prasetyo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the logistics and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
