Impact of Workload and Work-Life Balance on Aviation Safety at Soekarno-Hatta ATC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/lomr.v4i1.3255Keywords:
Workload, Work-life Balance, Aviation Safety, Air Traffic ServiceAbstract
The increasing complexity of air traffic operations and the high cognitive demands placed on Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs) underscore the critical need to address factors affecting performance and safety. This study investigates the influence of workload and work-life balance (WLB) on safety outcomes among ATCs at Soekarno-Hatta International Airport through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). This research is motivated by the growing concern over fatigue-related incidents in aviation, particularly in high-density airspace environments. By synthesizing empirical and theoretical findings from peer-reviewed literature, this study explores how excessive workload, rigid shift structures, and insufficient recovery periods contribute to cognitive fatigue, diminished attentional control, and elevated error rates. In contrast, structured WLB interventions—such as optimized shift rotations, mandatory rest periods, and supportive scheduling policies—are found to mitigate fatigue and enhance operational vigilance. However, the applicability of flexible working hours in ATC settings is constrained by the operational and regulatory frameworks of the aviation industry, particularly the standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). This study contributes to the discourse on aviation human factors by advocating tailored fatigue risk management strategies and institutional support mechanisms to improve ATC well-being and ensure sustained aviation safety performance
References
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2014). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 241-276.
Arasyandi, M. (2016). Analisa beban kerja mental dengan metode NASA TLX pada operator kargo di PT. Dharma Bandar Mandala (PT. DBM). Industrial Engineering Online Journal.
Beauregard, T. A., & Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the link between work-life balance practices and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.09.001
Bernhardt, K. A., Poltavski, D., Petros, T., Ferraro, F. R., Jorgenson, T., Carlson, C., Drechsel, P., & Iseminger, C. (2019). The effects of dynamic workload and experience on commercially available EEG cognitive state metrics in a high-fidelity air traffic control environment. Applied Ergonomics, 77, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.008
Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE Publications.
Briggs, S., Barrett, C., & O’Brien, C. (2012). Air traffic controllers: A study on work-life balance. Journal of Aviation Studies, 5(1), 50-68.
Buser, M., & Machin, M. A. (2017). Work-life balance among air traffic controllers: Challenges and best practices. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 27(4), 267-284.
Cahill, J., Cullen, P., Anwer, S., & Gaynor, K. (2020). Stress management in air traffic control: Review of intervention strategies. Aviation Psychology Journal, 24(3), 145-157.
Costa, G. (2003). Shift work and occupational health: An overview. Occupational Medicine, 53(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg045
Costa, G. (2010). Shift work and health: Current problems and preventive actions. Safety and Health at Work, 1(2), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2010.1.2.112
Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situational awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
Eurocontrol. (2018). ATC fatigue management guidelines.
Eurocontrol. (2018). Safety management in air traffic control. Retrieved from www.eurocontrol.int.
Gerbersdorf, S. U., Cimatoribus, C., Class, H., Engesser, K.-H., Helbich, S., Hollert, H., Lange, C., Kranert, M., Metzger, J., Nowak, W., Seiler, T.-B., Steger, K., Steinmetz, H., & Wieprecht, S. (2015). Anthropogenic trace compounds (ATCs) in aquatic habitats — Research needs on sources, fate, detection and toxicity to ensure timely elimination strategies and risk management. Environment International, 79, 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.011
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Ibáñez, J., Travieso, D., Navia, J., Montes, A., Jacobs, D., & Frutos, P. (2023). Experimental validation of COMETA model of mental workload in air traffic control. Journal of Air Transport Management, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2023.102378
ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization). (2020). Manual on air traffic management safety. Montreal: ICAO.
Kanki, B. G., Helmreich, R. L., & Anca, J. (2010). Crew resource management (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Kerns, K. (1999). Flight deck communication and air traffic control communications: A focus on safety. Air Traffic Quarterly, 7(2), 123-150.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report.
Li, Q., Ng, K. K. H., Yu, S. C. M., Yiu, C. Y., & Lyu, M. (2023). Recognising situation awareness associated with different workloads using EEG and eye-tracking features in air traffic control tasks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 260, 110179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110179
Pang, Y., Hu, J., Lieber, C. S., Cooke, N. J., & Liu, Y. (2023). Air traffic controller workload level prediction using conformalized dynamical graph learning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 57, 102113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102113
Pérez-Castán, J. A., Asensio, B., Rodríguez-Sanz, Á., Ho-Huu, V., Pérez Sanz, L., Gómez Comendador, F., & Arnaldo Valdés, R. M. (2020). Impact of continuous climb operations in ATC workload: Case-study Palma airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101890
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Somers, V. L. J., Borst, C., Mulder, M., & van Paassen, M. M. (2019). Evaluation of a 3D solution space-based ATC workload metric. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(19), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.166
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.
Widodo, S., Fahmi, R., & Pantaryanto, N. (2015). Tingkat stress pemandu lalu lintas penerbangan.
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2015). Engineering psychology and human performance (4th ed.). Pearson.
Wulanyani, N. M. (2013). Tantangan dalam mengungkap beban kerja mental. Buletin Psikologi, 80-89.
Xu, Q., Pang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Dynamic airspace sectorization with machine learning enhanced workload prediction and clustering. Journal of Air Transport Management, 121, 102683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102683
Downloads
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Giga Valtian Zepa, Hari Kurniawanto, Dimas Hari Cahyo, Daniel Dewantoro Rumani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the logistics and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
