Diagnosing Indonesia's Digital Connectivity Deficit: A Comparative Policy Analysis of the High-Cost and Low-Quality Paradox
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/lomr.v5i1.4242Keywords:
Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Telecommunications Market Structure, 5G Spectrum Policy, Network Infrastructure Sharing, Internet Affordability, IndonesiaAbstract
Indonesia stands at a critical interlude in its digital transformation. Despite achieving a high internet penetration rate of 79.5%, the nation exhibits a “quality paradox”: consumers pay more for slower, less reliable internet compared to their ASEAN peers. This study employs a qualitative comparative analysis of secondary data, applying a Comparative Market Analysis and a structured Peer-Aspiration Comparative Framework, to examine the structural factors associated with Indonesia’s telecommunications performance deficit. The findings suggest that the lag in internet quality is associated with three interrelated structural conditions: geographic deployment constraints, regulatory spectrum scarcity (particularly the 3.5 GHz band), and an oligopolistic market structure. By benchmarking Indonesia against Vietnam as a developmental peer and South Korea as an aspirational model, this study identifies policy and investment directions for improving Indonesia’s connectivity outcomes. It recommends that the government transition from an infrastructure builder to a market facilitator by reforming spectrum policies and enabling active infrastructure sharing, while telecommunication operators shift investments toward Quality of Experience (QoE). These directions aim to address the structural conditions underlying the digital participation ceiling and support Indonesia’s transition toward meaningful, high-quality connectivity.
References
BAKTI Komdigi. (n.d.). Produk dan layanan Palapa Ring BAKTI Kominfo. Baktikomdigi.id. Retrieved October 10, 2025.
BusinessWorld. (2024, May 23). How expensive is the Philippines' fixed broadband compared with its peers in the region?. Bworldonline.com.
CNBC Indonesia. (2024, July 5). Tantangan pembangunan infrastruktur & kesiapan talenta digital di RI. Cnbcindonesia.com.
Detikcom, T. (2025, August 3). Adu kecepatan internet di Asia Tenggara, Indonesia peringkat berapa. detik.com.
Detikinet, T. (2025). Siapa penguasa pasar operator seluler Indonesia? Ini jawabannya. Detik.com.
Fitrialbaasitu. (n.d.). Jaringan internet di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang untuk masa depan. Fitrialbaasitu.com.
Global Relocate. (n.d.). Worldwide data pricing. Global-relocate.com.
Hasmar, W. O. M. (2017). Kesenjangan digital di Indonesia (Studi kasus di Kabupaten Wakatobi). Neliti.
Hidayat, M. U. (2020). Analisa efektifitas RAN sharing pada perusahaan telekomunikasi (Studi kasus RAN sharing XL – Indosat). IncomTech: Jurnal Telekomunikasi dan Komputer, 10(1), 7-14.
Hieu, M. (2024, September 19). Quiz: Which country has the cheapest fixed broadband internet in Southeast Asia?. VnExpress International.
Higo. (n.d.). Faktor yang buat kecepatan internet di Korea Selatan kencang. Higo Blog.
Indonesia.go.id. (2025). Komitmen pemerintah melindungi anak di ruang digital. Indonesia.go.id.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform. (2015). Kajian telekomunikasi. ICJR.
International Telecommunication Union. (2024). Regulatory incentives for operators. ITU DataHub.
Kemp, S. (2025, February). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal.
Khoirunnissa, J. (2024, December 9). Apa itu Palapa Ring? Ini penjelasan dan cakupan wilayahnya. detikNews.
Komdigi. (n.d.). Palapa Ring hadirkan internet murah bagi masyarakat. Komdigi.go.id.
Kominfo. (2021). Kesenjangan digital di Indonesia: Antara akses dan kompetensi. Jurnal Pekommas, 6(1), 1-10.
KPPN Watampone. (2024, July 29). Peran APBN untuk pengembangan insfrastruktur digital di daerah terpencil. Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI.
KPPN Watampone. (n.d.). Optimalisasi insentif fiskal sektor UMKM dalam konteks digitalisasi ekonomi. Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan Kementerian Keuangan RI.
Mawardi, C. (2019). Analisa regulasi network sharing berbasis Multi Operator Core Network (MOCN). ResearchGate.
Mustakim. (2019). Tantangan implementasi 5G di Indonesia. INTEGER: Journal of Information Technology, 4(2).
Novera, A. (2020). Sengketa dugaan pelanggaran dalam industri telekomunikasi yang dilakukan oleh PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 1(2).
Nugroho, S. A. (2022). Analisis penetapan pasar bersangkutan dalam putusan KPPU. Al' Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 14(1), 23-40.
Opensignal. (2025, October 10). ASEAN digital infrastructure: The role of spectrum. Opensignal.
Parker, S. (2025). Ranked: Internet costs by country in 2025. Visual Capitalist.
Sari, D. P., & Situmeang, R. R. (2022). Analisis yuridis terhadap praktek diskriminasi Telkom Group terhadap penyediaan layanan akses internet Netflix berdasarkan hukum persaingan usaha. Reformasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 12(2), 453-461.
SDPPI Kemkominfo. (2021, March 24). Geografis tantangan konektivitas telekomunikasi Indonesia. Postel.go.id.
Telkom Indonesia. (2025, April 19). Laporan keuangan Telkom tahun 2024: Telkom tutup tahun 2024 dengan kinerja positif, pendapatan konsolidasi sebesar Rp150 triliun. Telkom.co.id.
Tempo Interaktif. (2009). Korea Selatan bangun koneksi internet super cepat. Tempo.co.
Tempo.co. (2022, June 7). Tantangan 5G di Indonesia, Kominfo: 12 ribu desa belum dapat 4G. Tempo.co.
Tempo.co. (2024, December 18). 3 operator seluler tersisa usai XL dan Smartfren merger, ini untungnya bagi pelanggan. Tempo.co.
Universitas Indonesia. (2017). Analisis yuridis terhadap dugaan praktik tying-in layanan IndiHome Triple Play oleh PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. UI Library.
Widyanto, A., & Hasibuan, Z. A. (2014). Studi pengukuran digital divide di Indonesia. ResearchGate.
Downloads
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rafii Naufal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Content Licensing, Copyright, and Permissions
1. License
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purposes. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article, the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR).
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the author or Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of the Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and the logistics and Operation Management Review (LOMR) or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Logistic and Operation Management Review (LOMR) may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers
