The Outcry of Parents of Drug Surrenderees: A Phenomenology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31098/pba.v4i1.3305Keywords:
Parents outcry, Drug surrenderees, Experiences, Challenges, Coping Mechanism, Insight, CriminologyAbstract
The pervasive impact of the Philippine government’s anti-drug campaign has placed significant emotional, social, and moral burdens on families. However, the voices of parents—who often carry the weight of stigma, fear, and uncertainty—remain largely unheard. In the Philippines, the growing problem of illegal drug use has deeply affected not only those directly involved but also their families—particularly parents—whose struggles often go unnoticed. Responding to this gap, this study explored the outcry of parents of drug surrenderers. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 14 parents in Laak, Davao de Oro, to capture their lived experiences. Thematic analysis revealed three major experiences: emotional turmoil, strength in adversity, and doing what is right. Coping mechanisms included remaining strong and discerning, providing unwavering love and support, and maintaining faith and trust in the Almighty—strategies that enabled them to endure the challenges of substance abuse within the family. Insights shared by participants emphasized perseverance, open communication, and hope in God. These findings highlight the resilience and determination of parents facing the repercussions of drug involvement in their families, underscoring the need for empathetic, culturally sensitive interventions. Recommendations include community-based support programs, peer groups, and educational initiatives to empower parents and strengthen their coping abilities.
References
Allado, M. A. D., Gumba, N. G. M., Melo, K. J., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2019). A narrative analysis of the experiences of barangay officials involved in community-based drug rehabilitation. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.31710/pjp/0052.01.02
Alvarado, A. Y. (2020). Preparedness, acceptance, and commitment as predictors of efficacy of the wellness program for drug surrenderers. Globus Journal of Progressive Education, 10(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.46360/globus.edu.220201015
Arenga, I. M. (2022). Personality tendencies, family dynamics, spiritual connectedness, and extent of drug dependency: Bases for a psycho-spiritual intervention program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Analysis, Education, and Development, 50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7516484
Atun, J. M. L., Mendoza, R. U., David, C. C., Cossid, R. P. N., & Soriano, C. R. R. (2019). The Philippines’ anti-drug campaign: Spatial and temporal patterns of killings linked to drugs. International Journal of Drug Policy, 73, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.035
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
Campeceno, J., Gamba, M., Josol, A., Olaer, D., Pagaran, M., Renoblas, R., Jr., & Molina, S. (2022). Lived experiences of interventionists on the drug rehabilitation program. University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 10(1), 20–41.
Canoy, N. A., & Villasanta, A. P. V. P. (2022). Marking a quiet community: Analyzing narratives of community reentry among Filipino plea bargainers. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 35(2), 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2021.1878076
Carpizo, E. M., & Sansano, A. G. S. (2019, December). Impact of the moral recovery program for drug surrenderers in Cavite. In Abstract proceedings of the International Scholars Conference (Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 901–908).
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
Collado, Z. C. (2019). Living in displacement context: Coping strategies, changing attitudes, and family dynamics among internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Mindanao, Philippines. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(4), 484–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1551168
Cordero, D. A., Jr. (2022). Exploring community-based interventions for substance use disorder in the Philippines. Family Practice, 39(6), 1192–1193.
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.9.1.35
De Leeuw, E. D. (2012). Choosing the method of data collection. In International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 113–135). Taylor & Francis Group.
Flores, C., & Ramirez, J. (2022). Family engagement in substance use recovery: A qualitative synthesis. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 136, 108–118.
Fuentes, B. E., Gengania, J. B., Malon, K. A. A., Mayol, K. L. U., Allanic, E. A., & Cuevas, J. F., Jr. (2023). Lived experiences of police officers in the implementation of operational plan against illegal drugs. Mediterranean Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.46382/MJBAS.2023.7304
Garmezy, N. (1986). Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Recent research in developmental psychopathology (pp. 213–233). Pergamon Press.
Hechanova, M. R. M., Reyes, J. C., Acosta, A. C., & Tuliao, A. P. (2020). Psychosocial treatment for incarcerated methamphetamine users: The Philippines experience. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 16(4), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-09-2019-0044
Jackson, L., Newell, J., & Crone, D. (2021). Stigma and support: Exploring experiences of parents of substance-using young people. Journal of Substance Use, 26(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2020.1789205
Jongenelis, M., Pettigrew, S., Lawrence, D., & Rikkers, W. (2019). Factors associated with poly drug use in adolescents. Prevention Science, 20, 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-00993-8
Kiblasan, J. I., Tukaki, G. B., & Chakas, R. F. (2020). Community-based rehabilitation program in the municipality of Bauko, Mountain Province, Philippines. Medico-Legal Update, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v20i4.1809
Kumpfer, K. L., Whiteside, H. O., Greene, J. A., & Allen, K. C. (2008). Effectiveness outcomes of four age versions of the strengthening families program in statewide field sites. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.3.211
Lasco, G., & Yarcia, L. E. (2022). The politics of drug rehabilitation in the Philippines. Health and Human Rights, 24(1), 147.
Lee, C., & Hser, Y. (2021). Parental stress and coping in families affected by adolescent drug use. Substance Use & Misuse, 56(4), 512–526.
Limpin, D., & Siringan, R. (2019). Developing a method for recording drug-related killings. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 34(1), 1–26.
McCann, T. V., Lubman, D. I., & Boardman, G. (2017). Experiences of family members supporting a relative with substance use problems: A qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0610-8
Mijares, A. M. P. (2020). Rebuilding lives amid the ruins of Duterte’s war on drugs. Journal of Human Rights and Peace Studies, 6(2), 255–282.
Mina, F. L. P. (2022). Factors that influence drug addiction: An analysis of tokhang surrenderers institution-based rehabilitation. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i8-07
O’Shay-Wallace, S. (2019). “We weren’t raised that way”: Using stigma management communication theory to understand how families manage the stigma of substance abuse. Health Communication, 35(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1567443
Orford, J., Velleman, R., Copello, A., Templeton, L., & Ibanga, A. (2010). The experiences of affected family members: A summary of two decades of qualitative research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687630903040385
Pangilinan, M. K. A., Fernandez, M. C., Quijano, N., & Dizon, W., Jr. (2021). Examining the effects of drug-related killings on Philippine conditional cash transfer beneficiaries in Metro Manila, 2016–2017. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32082.91849/1
Pelegrino, J. T. (2022). Drug rehabilitation program from the lens of surrenderers. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 62(1), 235–249. https://www.gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/13850
Ramos, S. D. A. (2019). The recovery-oriented therapeutic community for addictions (ROTC): A response to contemporary substance use disorder treatments in the Philippines. Therapeutic Communities, 40(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-12-2017-0037
Romualdo, A. (2022). Analytical functionality model: A drug-clearing operation intervention mechanism for the barangay anti-drug abuse council (BADAC). Journal of Government and Political Issues, 2(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.53341/jgpi.v2i1.38
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Substance abuse treatment and family therapy (Treatment Improvement Protocol Series No. 39). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/Substance-Abuse-Treatment-and-Family-Therapy/SMA13-4784
Simbulan, N., Estacio, L., Dioquino-Maligaso, C., Herbosa, T., & Withers, M. (2019). The Manila Declaration on the drug problem in the Philippines. Annals of Global Health, 85(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2411
Slade, M., Amering, M., & Oades, L. (2019). Recovery: An international perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 28(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000289
Smith, L., Harper, T., & Colburn, T. (2021). Family-centered approaches to substance use recovery: A review of recent evidence. Addiction Research & Theory, 29(5), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2020.1849121
Sy, M. P., & Ohshima, N. (2019). Utilising the occupational justice health questionnaire (OJHQ) with a Filipino drug surrenderer in occupational therapy practice: A case report. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 75(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2018.1505682
Termini, R. B., & Good, R. M. (2020). 50 years post–Controlled Substances Act: The war on drugs rages on with opioids at the forefront. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 46, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432531
Velleman, R., & Templeton, L. (2016). Impact of substance misuse on children: Research findings and guidance. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1175419
Wakeman, S. E., Larochelle, M. R., Ameli, O., Chaisson, C. E., McPheeters, J. T., Crown, W. H., & Sanghavi, D. M. (2020). Comparative effectiveness of different treatment pathways for opioid use disorder. JAMA Network Open, 3(2), e1920622. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20622
Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x
Warburg, A. B., & Jensen, S. (2020). Ambiguous fear in the war on drugs: A reconfiguration of social and moral orders in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 51(1–2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463420000211
Wilson, J. (2015). Essentials of interpretive phenomenological analysis. Teaching Research Methods, 8(1), 1–10.
Yusay, C. T. C., & Canoy, N. A. (2019). Healing the hurt amid the drug war: Narratives of young urban poor Filipinos in recovering families with parental drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 68, 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.10.009
Zafeiropoulou, E. (2022). Ever-emerging meaning: An exploration into the way in which families and therapists position themselves in stories of drug misuse (Doctoral dissertation, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust & University of East London).
Zaidi, U. (2020). Role of social support in relapse prevention for drug addicts. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(1), 915–924.
Downloads
Published
Citation Check
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Regine A. Ramirez, Ariel A. Alamban

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice: 1. License
People and Behavior Analysis has CC-BY NC or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work for non-commercial purpose. The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Creative Commons License
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
People and Behavior Analysis objective is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, this journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and this journal on distributing works in the journal.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article,
the right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (People and Behavior Analysis).
The author has a non-exclusive publishing contract with a publisher and the work is published with a more restrictive license, the author retains all the rights to publish the work elsewhere, including commercially, because she/he is not subject to the conditions of her / his own license, regardless of the type of CC license chosen.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Termination
This agreement can be terminated by the author or People and Behavior Analysis upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of People and Behavior Analysis.
7. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by This agreement can be terminated by the People and Behavior Analysis upon two months’ notice where the other party has materially breached this agreement and failed to remedy such breach within a month of being given the terminating party’s notice requesting such breach to be remedied. No breach or violation of this agreement will cause this agreement or any license granted in it to terminate automatically or affect the definition of People and Behavior Analysis or its sublicensee.
8. Miscellaneous
People and Behavior Analysis will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and People and Behavior Analysis or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article. People and Behavior Analysis may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that it deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers.
