Examining the Regional Economic Integration: Analysis of Cross-border Trade among ASEAN, China, and India

Authors

  • Sadia Abbassy Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Afghanistan
  • M Luthfi Hameedi Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fajar B Hirawan Universitas Islam Internasional Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v8i2.3172

Abstract

Researchers have studied economic integration since the late 20th century as global markets become interconnected. ASEAN, China, and India are critical political, economic, and infrastructural players, with a growing middle class of over 3.50 billion projected to rise as the fourth-largest economy by 2030. This study examines trade policies, GDP, FDI, proximity, and regional agreements to assess trade flows and economic integration. This study uses a gravity model with panel data regression (1999-2023) to examine regional trade flows. The gravity model estimates the impact of economic size and distance on trade volumes, whereas panel data regression evaluates the relationship between trade policies and economic integration. Data include trade statistics from secondary sources. The finding reveals that economic integration improves trade volume through aligned policies and economic interdependencies. The gravity model highlights that economic size and proximity sustain trade flows, whereas FDI shows a positive correlation, indicating the potential for more profound integration; the trade potential model examines how trade policies and economic size affect intra-regional commerce, a topic rarely studied in the literature. This study calculates trade potential, offering insights for policymakers to improve trade efficiency. Unlike past research that has isolated ASEAN, China, and India, this study provides a comprehensive regional perspective. However, these limitations exclude exchange rates, technology, language, tariffs, and post-2023 applicability.

References

Adila, S., & Suryadipura, D. (2023). ASEAN’s role in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) formation to enhance regional economic integration. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v25i1.1279

Akhter, N., & Ghani, E. (2010). Regional integration in South Asia: An analysis of trade flows using the gravity model. The Pakistan Development Review, 49(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.30541/v49i2pp.105-118

Alvstam, C., Dolles, H., & Ström, P. (2015). Asian inward and outward FDI: New challenges in the global economy. Springer.

Anshari, M., & Ali, E. (2023). Impact of economic integration on Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (pp. 30–43). http://www.eurekaselect.com/chapter/18441

ASEAN Prosperity Initiative. (2022). ASEAN integration report 2022. https://www.ideas.org.my/publications-item/asean-integration-report-2022/

ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). ASEAN-China Free Trade Area business portal. https://www.asean-cn.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=219&id=3203

ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). ASEAN statistical yearbook 2023 (1st ed.).

Balassa, B. (2011). The theory of economic integration (Routledge revivals). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805183

Batra, A. (2007). Asian economic integration: ASEAN+ 3 + 1 or ASEAN+ 1s? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 24(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE24-2A

Banda, D. O., & Whalley, J. (2005). Beyond goods and services: Competition policy, investment, mutual recognition, movement of persons, and broader cooperation provisions of recent FTAs involving ASEAN countries. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Papers.

Bharti, M. S., & Kumari, S. (2024). China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia and its implications for ASEAN-China strategic partnership. Asian Review of Political Economy, 3(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44216-024-00042-4

Bhowmick, S., & Paul, T. (2024, August 31). India’s evolving trade strategy with ASEAN. Observer Research Foundation.

Brada, J. C., & Mendez, J. A. (1985). Economic integration among developed, developing, and centrally planned economies: A comparative analysis. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 549. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924798

Chia, S. Y. (2013). The ASEAN Economic Community: Progress, challenges, and prospects. Asian Development Bank Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346058

Chia, S. Y., & Sussangkarn, C. (2006). The economic rise of China: Challenges and opportunities for ASEAN. Asian Economic Policy Review, 1(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3131.2006.00011.x

Chiang, M.-H. (2019). China–ASEAN economic relations after establishment of free trade area. The Pacific Review, 32(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1470555

El-Agraa, A. M. (1989). The theory and measurement of international economic integration (1st ed.). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-10203-7

Ganai, S. G., Khan, J. A., & Bhat, S. A. (2023). The impact of global integration on the economic growth of India and China. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.35716/IJED/22076

Garg, A. (2022). India–ASEAN: Trade relation analysis and its exclusion from RCEP. Indian Economic Services.

Gurunathan, A., & Moorthy, R. (2021). Riding the Indo-Pacific wave: India–ASEAN partnership sans RCEP. Millennial Asia, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284211047707

Hong, Z. (2007). India and China: Rivals or partners in Southeast Asia? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1355/CS29-1F

Hv, V., Thompson, F., & Tonby, O. (2014). Understanding ASEAN: Seven things you need to know. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/asia-pacific/understanding-asean-seven-things-you-need-to-know

Jose, H. S., & Samudra, H. D. S. P. (2022). Toward a new ASEAN regionalism: Navigating the outlook on Indo-Pacific in post-RCEP beyond 2020. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, 9(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2022.9.1.4636

Kato, A. (2022). Trade competition between ASEAN, China, and India: The post-trade war and COVID-19 scenario. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 14(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101211073376

Kien, N.T., (2009). Gravity model by panel data approach: Empirical application with implications for the ASEAN Free Trade Area. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(3), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE26-3C

Khati, P., & Kim, C. (2023). Impact of India’s free trade agreement with ASEAN on its goods exports: A gravity model analysis. Economies, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010008

Liu, H., Xu, C., & Lim, G. (2023). The effect of China on regional economic integration: A longitudinal study of Central, South, and Southeast Asia. Journal of the Asia–Pacific Economy, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2023.2258018

Maria, R. S., Urata, S., & Intal, P. (2017). The ASEAN economic community into 2025 and beyond. ERIA, 5, 1–252.

Plummer, M. G. (1997). ASEAN and the theory of regional economic integration: A survey. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 14(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE14-2H

Pöyhönen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90(1), 93–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40436776

Rajan, R. S., & Sen, R. (2004). The new wave of FTAs in Asia: With particular reference to ASEAN, China, and India.

Silva, J.S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641

Sarin, V. (2018). Understanding India-ASEAN trading ties using gravity model approach. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistics Sciences, 223–229.

Sen, R. (2006). “New regionalism” in Asia: A comparative analysis of emerging regional and bilateral trading agreements involving ASEAN, China and India. Journal of World Trade, 40(4), 553–596. https://doi.org/10.54648/TRAD2006031

Sudan, F. K. (2022). Indo-Pacific strategy and India’s opportunities and challenges in regional economic cooperation and integration: An exploratory review. Global Economics Science. https://doi.org/10.37256/ges.3220221290

Tinbergen, J. (1963). Shaping the world economy. The International Executive, 5(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.5060050113

World Bank. (2015). Picture trade: How we can visualize intra-regional trade in South Asia and beyond. World Bank Blogs.

World Bank. (2023, October 3). Overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/afghanistan/overview

Zhai, H. (2023). Evaluation of China-ASEAN trade status and trade potential: An empirical study based on a gravity model. PLOS ONE, 18(9), e0290897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290897

Zhang, D. X. (2023). South–South cooperation is key to sustainable growth. WTO Blog.

Downloads

Published

May 31, 2025

Citation Check

How to Cite

Abbassy, S., Hameedi, M. L., & Hirawan, F. B. (2025). Examining the Regional Economic Integration: Analysis of Cross-border Trade among ASEAN, China, and India. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, 8(2), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v8i2.3172

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Article Index